By Cheryl Sullenger
Recently, there have been rapid developments regarding the COVID-19 vaccines that have raised new questions about the growing number of adverse effects caused by these experimental injections, especially as it relates to the rising numbers of vaccine-related deaths, its effects on unborn babies, the future fertility of men and women who take them and the effects on children under 18 years of age.
“Because we are pro-life, we are always concerned about the lives and welfare of all people. When we see evidence of deaths and harm to health, especially in children and babies, we are obligated to try to get to the bottom of it and keep the public as informed as possible,” said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman. “We understand the issue of COVID-19 vaccines is a divisive topic, but we present this information not to create division, but to share information about the vaccines. What people do with that information should be up to them.”
Earlier, Operation Rescue posted information provided by a whistleblower who sits on a COVID-19 task force who first came forward to Abortion Free New Mexico to warn of pregnancy complications that were being reported by women after they took one of the vaccines. That whistleblower then provided a recorded interview to Mark Harrington, Director of Created Equal. That interview dealt with pregnancy outcomes such as miscarriage and impacts to future fertility that appear to be caused by the COVID-19 vaccines.
A second interview newly released interview with that whistleblower was conducted by Harrington that discusses why the whistleblower believes the COVID-19 vaccines should be viewed with caution due to information she is receiving in the course of her duties on the task force. This information is being suppressed by mainstream media sources.
The whistleblower is highly credentialed.
She is an U.S. Army veteran who was awarded the National Defense and Global War on Terrorism Service Medal. She earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Molecular Biology, a Master of Science degree in Nanoscience and Microsystems, and a PhD in Engineering focusing on Nanoscience.
However, she must remain anonymous due to threats of repercussions against her, and members of her team should they release information that runs contrary to the current regime’s public narrative.
Why COVID-19 Vaccines are Different
The COVID-19 vaccines are still experimental and are being used under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) since they have not yet been fully approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
During the interview, the nanoscience expert explains how are different than other vaccines.
Usually, a small amount of a particular virus is introduced to the body through the upper arm. That provokes an immune response and the development of antibodies that provide immunity against the virus. The vaccine stays in the arm and cannot travel throughout the body.
However, the current COVID-19 vaccines are based on nanoparticles of messenger RNA (mRNA). These mRNA vaccines carry a genetic code that tricks human cells into manufacturing the virus, according to the nanoscience expert. This is significantly different than how other types of vaccines work.
The nanoscience expert noted explicitly that it is well known in her field that if nanoparticles are introduced to the body, they are distributed throughout the body and do not stay in the arm. The tiny particles of genetic material travel throughout the body and settle in various systems, including ovaries, testes, heart, spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands, and can even cross the blood-brain barrier.
Those who have been vaccinated develop spike proteins on cells throughout the body. Those spike proteins are antigens that provoke an immune response. The expert explained that because of this unique way the mRNA vaccines work, they can produce an immune response that can attack the cells – and thus the systems – that contain the spike proteins.
Other sources confirm that explanation, including data contained in a recently filed federal lawsuit that is seeking to revoke the Emergency Use Authorization permits based on an unprecedented number of adverse effects reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is operated by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the FDA.
Estimated COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Deaths
A second whistleblower has come forward to file an affidavit in support of that federal lawsuit brought this month by America’s Frontline Doctors against U.S. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra. [ See America’s Frontline Doctors v. Becerra, Case 2:21-cv-00702, Motion for Preliminary Injunction.]
This whistleblower, known as “Jane Doe,” is a computer programmer with expertise in health care data analytics.
Doe explains in her affidavit that after analyzing data from Medicare and Medicaid programs, she found that as of July 9, 2021, there were 9,048 deaths reported to the VAERS system. She correlated additional death numbers from the Medicare and Medicaid programs and determined that VAERS was underreporting by a factor of at least five.
That means, according to her analysis, that at least 45 thousand people have died within 72 hours of having taken a COVID-19 vaccine.
The nanoscience expert, who was interviewed before the second whistleblower’s affidavit became public, noted that there were at that time 15,472 deaths related to the COVID-19 vaccines reported in Europe, and 5,393 deaths reported in the U.S. through the VAERSsystem, which receives voluntary reports of adverse vaccine reactions.
Both sources claimed that due to the voluntary nature of VAERS, only about one to ten percent of all adverse reactions and deaths caused by the COVID-19 vaccines are reported.
So, is this normal?
A document recently released by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) shows an interesting data point. The number of petitions filed because of vaccine-related deaths from October 1, 1988, through July 1, 2021 – nearly 33 years of data collection – was a total of 1,352 for 32 categories of vaccines.
This shows that the deaths related to the COVID-19 vaccines far outpace the combined total of deaths from vaccine complications over the past three decades.
In contrast, during the 1976 Swine Flu epidemic, vaccines were suddenly halted after just 53 vaccine-related deaths and approximately 500 people developing Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), which is an immune response that attacks the peripheral nervous system and causes the sudden onset of muscle pain and weakness.
It is obvious that the Covid-19 vaccines, which have caused at least 9,048 deaths – and likely more – pose a shockingly high risk of death to those who take them, compared to all other vaccines.
Both whistleblowers provided data that was consistent with each other, even though there is no evidence that the two women knew each other.
Another widely interviewed source, Dr. Peter McCullough, is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, and Professor of Medicine at Texas A & M College of Medicine, Dallas, Texas. He further describes how the vaccines work differently than other vaccines and about his observations of complications of which he believes the public should be aware.
“We can’t continue to do this and blindside Americans and some people all over the world on safety. We can’t ask them to take a vaccine without giving fair disclosure. . . on safety information,” Dr. McCullough said during an interview on the Stew Peters Show on July 21, 2021. “This program should have been shut down in February on safety.”
Other Adverse Effects
The Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed in America’s Frontline Doctors v. Becerra contains a detailed explanation of adverse effects experienced by some people who have been given the experimental vaccines. Some of those adverse effects include:
- Increased risk of death.
- Vascular disease.
- Autoimmune disease.
- Neurological damage (including brain bleeding and dementia).
- Harmful effects on the young.
- Chronic diseases.
- Blood supply tainted with toxic spike proteins.
The nanoscience expert added her own list of known complications to the COVID-19 vaccines.
“These nanoparticles go over the body so we’re seeing adverse effects in virtually every single organ system of the body,” she said. “We’ve had a case of blindness being reported, deafness, seizures, other neurological problems. The clotting disorders are very common. Low platelets are another one that’s very common.”
She also noted that 2,333 heart attacks have been reported after taking the vaccine, along with over 1,000 cases of Myocarditis, which is inflammation of the heart.
The America’s Frontlines Doctors motion references a new study, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons” published by the New England Journal of Medicine on June 17, 2021. It notes that, according to the study, “pregnant women receiving Vaccines during their first or second trimesters suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.”
The VAERS database contains over 3,000 reports of failed pregnancies associated with the vaccines as of April 26, 2021.
There also appears to be evidence that the vaccines may cause infertility in men and women, perhaps in the long term. Because the virus’ spike proteins closely resemble sperm and egg cells, an immune response to COVID-19 could also provoke an immune attack on those reproductive cells.
This attack on reproductive cells raises risks of infertility and the possibility that the inability to reproduce may be permanent.
According to a leaked Pfizer document that appeared in the motion, spike proteins from COVID-19 vaccines settle in the ovaries at a concentrated rate.
The motion also states, “Each baby girl is born with the total number of eggs she will ever have in her entire life. Those eggs are stored in the ovaries, and one egg is released each month of a normal menstrual cycle.”
That raises the question that if a pregnant woman who is carrying a baby girl receives a COVID-19 vaccination, could the spike protein antigens also settle in her unborn daughter’s ovaries and cause infertility issues for her daughter later in life? There needs to be more research to know that for sure.
There is also evidence that vaccinated pregnant women have developed an inflamed uterus on the mother’s side of the organ, which has led to second trimester still-births.
Because of the risk of loss of life for unborn babies and the potential for future infertility, the nanoscience whistle blower emphatically discourages pregnant women from taking the COVID-19 vaccines.
These specific risks to future fertility raise questions about the possibility that a depopulation agenda may be involved.
Risks to Adolescents
The COVID-19 virus appears to have little impact on children 18-years of age and younger. When symptoms do develop, they are generally mild. There is only an unlikely minuscule risk of death from COVID-19 in this age category.
However, the same cannot be said for youngsters who take the vaccines.
The inventor of the mRNA vaccine process, Dr. Robert Malone is not warning adults against taking the vaccines, but he has issued serious warnings about risks to children.
Dr. Malone has calculated the risks of mRNA on children based on scientific data, then shared his worries.
“Based on Pfizer hospitalizations, the Pfizer vaccine is 3.5 times more likely to cause a 12 to 17-year-olds to be hospitalized than the CDC predicts it will prevent hospitalization from the disease itself. For 12 to 17-year-old females, the Pfizer vaccine is 4.5 times more likely to cause hospitalization than the CDC predicts to prevent it, by similar calculations,” Dr. Malone stated.
Of adolescent deaths, Dr. Malone’s figures are staggering.
“12 to 17-year-old males are only 16% more likely to die from COVID than the vaccine. Females aged 12 to 17 years old are 72% more likely to die from their vaccine than COVID itself,” said Dr. Malone.
The American Frontlines Doctor’s lawsuit made several startling allegations. After COVID-19 was designated a “pandemic” by the World Health Organization last year, America went through an unprecedented push for testing on a massive scale. Of course, the more testing that is done, the more cases are going to be found.
Also, according to the suit, a study funded by the French government showed the false positivity rate of the PCR tests – the type used in the U.S. – was as much as 97%. That means of the number of real COVID-19 cases was artificially inflated.
Likewise, deaths from the virus were equally unreliable. That is because on March 24, 2020, the DHHS changed the reporting rules that applied to coroners and others who generated death certificates. This mandated that COVID-19 be listed as the cause of death when the virus caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”
However, the lawsuit claims that 95% of the people who allegedly died from COVID-19 had an average of four additional co-morbidities that may have actually been responsible for the deaths.
By pushing the inflated case numbers and suspicious death totals, authorities could justify locking down America, depriving people of freedoms, and destroying businesses. Americans were told that the only way back to “normal” was through the development and administration of vaccines.
In contrast, COVID-19 vaccines have been greatly promoted as safe, while the adverse effects from the experimental vaccines have been heavily suppressed.
Because the COVID-19 vaccines do not work like true vaccines, they have shown to provide little benefit to the user. They do, however, appear to reduce symptoms, but do not block transmission.
Even the regime media is reporting that thousands of people who have been fully vaccinated are now contracting COVID-19. An April 15, 2021, CNN, which is a big cheerleader for vaccines and other measures, reported that as of that time, 5,800 reportedly contracted COVIS-19 despite being fully vaccinated. That number is likely now much higher.
Again, according to Dr. Peter McCullough, there were 10,000 cases of vaccinated people contracting COVID-19 infections before the CDC stopped counting and reporting those numbers in May 2021. Because new cases are only being reported for unvaccinated people and do not include those who get sick with COVID-19 after being vaccinated, the new narrative is that this is a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” This is disingenuous at best because it hides the fact that, according to Dr. McCullough, people who are vaccinated account for an estimated 50% of all current COVID-19 infections.
With the emergence of the so-called “Delta variant” and other mutations, news broke just that a consortium, which includes billionaire globalists George Soros and Bill Gates – both of which are abortion and depopulation fanatics – has purchased Mologic Ltd., the largest manufacturer of the rapid COVID-19 tests, which are used in the U.S.
Back to Normal?
Mologic’s purchase by men who have admitted they want to see fewer people in the world does not bode well for a “normal” future for America and the rest of the world.
“There is no returning back to normal,” said Mark Harrington during his second interview with the nanoscience expert. Harrington cited the supposed new variants – especially the highly publicized Delta variant – as a reason for anticipated new lockdowns and other freedom-suppressing mandates predicted as early as this autumn.
Contrary to the new fear-inducing lockdown threats, the nanoscience expert noted during the same interview that as time passes, viral variants may become more easily transmittable, but they also become less deadly, and therefore, less of a threat.
While the summer months have seen relaxed COVID-19 mandates, the prospect of being permanently free from abusive government control over Americans remains dim.
For example, the American Academy of Pediatrics announced on July 19, 2020, that school children age two and up should be required to wear masks in class, whether they have been vaccinated or not. This is even though the children 18 and under suffer only mild symptoms – if any – from COVID-19, with only miniscule exceptions. This announcement is also contrary to findings in a recent Dutch study that masks have little to no effectiveness in stopping the spread of viruses.
Even Senate Republican Mitch McConnell has threatened lockdowns unless more people submit to the vaccines.
“These shots need to get in everybody’s arms as rapidly as possible or we’re going to be back in a situation in the fall that we don’t yearn for — that we went through last year,” McConnell said, according to Yahoo News.
“This kind of coercive pressure has nothing to do with health. It is about control. If these people have their way, even if every man, woman, and child were to take the vaccine, they would still not free us from their oppressive government overreach,” said Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue.
Even though it is against the Nuremberg Code to force experimental treatments on human beings without their consent, noted pro-abortion influencers are promoting the prospect of punishing those who do not voluntarily submit to the experimental COVID-19 vaccines until they are finally willing to capitulate.
Former Planned Parenthood CEO Leana Wen is now an analysist for CNN. She has become a cheerleader for mask mandates and says the government should make life difficult for the unvaccinated by instituting mandatory twice-weekly testing and other punishments for them.
Former Kansas Governor and Obama DHHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who supports unrestricted abortion throughout all nine months of pregnancy, takes it a step farther. She wants to see unvaccinated people prevented from working and interacting with the pubic, especially children.
Heavy taxes and travel prohibitions have also been discussed as possible punishments to force more people to submit to vaccination.
“Notice how so many of those pushing the vaccines the hardest are known supporters of abortion and worldwide depopulation. There is every indication that the Biden Administration and their sycophants in the media will continue to push fear to manipulate the American people for the purpose of advancing a Marxist-Maoist depopulation agenda that ends in socialism,” said Newman.
COVID-19 has a high survivability rate for adults under the age of 65. As previously mentioned, for adolescents, there is evidence that the risk of death from the vaccines is much greater than risks from the virus.
In November, 2020, the American Council on Science and Health published a report by Alex Berezow, PhD, who analyzed COVID-19 infection fatality rates by sex and age. He notes that young people of college age and younger are unlikely to suffer fatalities from the virus. For adults 65 and under, there is a 99.6 percent survivability rate or better.
At Your Own Risk
Every adult in this nation should have the right to make their own decisions about whether to take the experimental COVID-19 vaccines. Because those decisions should be informed ones, suppression of information about possible adverse effects is manipulative and wrong.
As with all experimental medical treatments, there are risk factors, known and unknown. In a free society, each person should have the right determine whether the risks outweigh the benefits, then accept or decline the vaccines as they see fit.
However, it is wrong to coerce or force anyone into taking experimental vaccines under threat of punishment that may include anything from inconvenience to financial ruin.
There is a current push by the Biden Administration to obtain full FDA approval of the current COVID-19 vaccines so vaccines can be mandated. Already some businesses and governmental agencies are requiring employees in some areas to get the vaccine in order to stay employed. That totally strips away any rights to health freedom and the ability to determine what is put into our bodies.
Because children under 18 cannot make health decisions for themselves and only suffer very mild symptoms – if any – when they contract COVID-19, there should be no reason to vaccinate them, mask them, or lock them down, since such measures have proven harmful.
“Adults are free to make up their own minds about whether to be vaccinated, but children can’t. Based on the available evidence, it is my opinion that the risks are just too high to support vaccinations for children and pregnant women,” said Newman. “I strongly stand in opposition to lockdowns and forced vaccinations as infringements on our precious freedoms. This virus may never go away, but it should decrease in intensity of symptoms over time. We must learn to live our lives as we would if it was any other virus that might be going around. Through the virus seasons, common sense precautions should be taken, but forced mask mandates, restricted activities, and shutdowns must be avoided if we are ever to regain our God-given freedoms.”
- Read: Vaccine Animal Trials Reveal Threat to Life in the Womb
- Read: Whistleblower Reveals Pregnancy Complications After COVID 19 Vaccine
- Read: Bombshell Interview with COVID-19 Task Force Whistleblower Warns of Vaccine Risks to Pregnant Women, (Contains first interview with the Nanoscience Whistleblower)