How one abortionist dropped out of the “rat-race” and into the Kansas killing fields
Wichita, KS — Susan Celina Robinson was disillusioned with the work-a-day world. A San Diego trained obstetrician-gynecologist who was working on staff at a clinic in New Hampshire, Susan was tired of endless staff meetings and the pressure to be ever more productive. She longed for more freedom to pursue a simpler life.
Born a baby-boomer on March 19, 1946, in New York City, Susan grew up in the 60s and had embraced the “counter-culture” ideology of the times. This ideology developed over time, and in 1985, Susan authored a book called Having a Baby Without a Man that explored a trend, popular among lesbians at that time, of having babies through artificial insemination, and parenting them in single-family or all female households.
Sometime in the early 1990s, Susan met and married David Peterson, a contractor and artisan who shared Susan’s romantic views of traveling the country and working only enough to support their freestyle, neo-hippie life.
In 1997, Susan and David quit their jobs, purchased a motor home and began a nomadic trek across the country in search of Utopia.
But it wasn’t long before they realized that life on the road wasn’t the carefree, romantic adventure they had hoped. They began to look for property where they could build their dream home and live to pursue their passions in life, which included dancing (Susan was particularly fond of Swing and Flamenco), dogs, and for David, woodworking arts.
They found that spot in the picturesque mountain foothills near Ukiah, California, and purchased 170 acres in a remote but beautiful area outside Ukiah, a small, almost rural Northern California community. There they founded “Dancing Dog Ranch.” They sold their motor home for a run-down 5th wheel, which they lived in until their new house, carved from virgin land, could be completed.
Their first building attempt ended in failure when the hay-bale structure they were building burned to the ground. Their second try at a more traditional structure proved more successful. David took his time, insuring the layout was perfect, the details were right, and the workmanship was exemplary and reflected his artistic expertise.
They obtained another dog, Roo, to befriend their older dog Woof. Roo is a trained boarder collie that once won a ribbon in a herding competition. But Susan later gave up competing because the training was too difficult and time-consuming.
Susan began per diem work at nearby hospitals and in May of 1999, she began gainful employment with Planned Parenthood Golden Gate, working two days per week.
“Nearby” was a relative term. She complained to family and friends that the driving distance to the two Planned Parenthood clinics were 100 miles to one location and 200 miles to the second, but found solace in knowing that her work was “helping people.”
But the reality was that while she was associated with Planned Parenthood Golden Gate, Susan’s primary duty was abortions. She never mentioned the true nature of her work to her friends and family. She spoke to them of the joys of teaching others her medical skills, when she was actually training physicians to butcher pre-born babies. She served in an advisory capacity on a paper produced by the University of California, San Francisco Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy titled “Early Abortion Training Workbook,” which, among other things, advises budding new abortionists on page 33 to avoid such “false reassurances” as, “You’ll be fine. This won’t hurt.”
Susan also has a record of at least one — possibly more — malpractice suits that have been filed against her.
Meanwhile, David obtained his California contractor’s license and began doing jobs for residents in the area under his new business name, Dancing Dog Construction. To supplement their income, David began making and selling simple pine caskets, ironically including infant sizes, in his meticulously ordered workshop at Dancing Dog Ranch.
Susan has been something of a low-key public activist championing leftist causes. She has spoken out against genetically enhanced foods and refused to patronize pet stores that sell puppies because of what she perceives is the cruel way they are raised. Susan once received an award in Ukiah for her volunteer work at a homeless shelter. She even voiced public opposition to last year’s narrowly defeated California initiative that would have allowed for parental notification of minors before abortions.
“These are the kinds of activities that feed the ego and her self-perception of being a liberal do-gooder,” said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman. “All these things are done for herself, we believe in a vain effort to assuage her guilty conscience for the child-killing she commits.”
Whether it was due to the constant traveling or the inadequate pay, Susan, left Planned Parenthood and began her current job with Women’s Health Care Services in Wichita, KS, in December, 2005, where she flies in every third week to kill babies for the most notorious late-term abortionist in the Western Hemisphere, George R. Tiller.
There, Susan is a recluse. Pro-lifers who watch the mill every hour it is open (and many hours when it is not) have observed that she seems to stay overnight at the abortion mill and never comes out, even for meals. This behavior is unlike that of other “circuit riding” abortionists that Tiller employs. Nebraska partial-birth abortionist LeRoy Carhart and his abortion partner and wife Mary Lou are regularly seen coming and going from the mill during their weeks in town. California abortionists Shelly Sella is also regularly seen.
Once information about Susan was released by Operation Rescue and additional information appeared on another web site, all mention of Dancing Dog Ranch, as well as David’s contracting and casket-making businesses was pulled from the Internet.
Could it be shame? Could it be she does not want her friends and family to know that she kills babies for a living? Or could it be some sick psychosis that draws her to the killing fields and will not allow her to lead a normal life?
“Susan has exhibited a life’s pattern of quickly tiring of difficult tasks, and it seems that the easy money from abortions at a facility where she has no other responsibilities appeals to her,” said Newman. “In other words, abortion is a field where she can make a fast buck with the least responsibilities, then run back to the haven she has created for herself in California where she can pretend to be some kind of humanitarian doctor in communion with the environment. Susan doesn’t seem to care who has to die to support her idealistic, utopian, lifestyle as long as she gets to do what she wants in life. And innocent babies are paying for that unrealistic fantasy with their very lives.”
“We pray that Susan will face her shame, realize abortion is morally reprehensible, repent, and stop killing babies,” said Newman. “Until then, we pray she may find no peace, even in the solitude of her remote and beloved ranch.”
View More Pictures
Read Previous Story About Robinson
Well, that’s creepy. Does he make the coffins for Tiller’s “memorial services” or do those babies go in the furnace with the unmemorialized ones?
“Put it in a hiding place where no one ever goes;
Put it in the pantry with your cupcakes….
It’s a little secret, just Ms. Robinson’s affair;
Most of all, you’ve got to hide it from the kids. . .”
“Out of the rat race”…?! Au contraire, Ms. Robinson has chosed to swell the rankest of the ranks of the creme de la crap of contemporary medical malpractice, the rats in the medicalized killing marathon, ranks following the hordes of like-minded medical vermin who carried out the atrocities of the Nazi holocaust.
“AT THE HEART OF THE NAZI ENTERPRISE, THEN, IS THE DESTRUCTION OF THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN HEALING AND KILLING.” — Robert Jay Lifton, “The Nazi Doctors”.
And, aside from ORW’s public confirmation of her abuse of what actual medical skills she may have, she won’t be able to hide it from the kids forever. Again, Congressman Henry Hyde’s remarks come to mind. . .
“When the time comes, as it surely will, when we face that awesome moment, the final judgment, I’ve often thought, as Fulton Sheen wrote, that it is a terrible moment of loneliness. You have no advocates, you are there alone standing before God — and a terror will rip your soul like nothing you can imagine. But I really think that those in the pro-life movement will not be alone. I think there’ll be a chorus of voices that have never been heard in this world but are heard beautifully and clearly in the next world — and they will plead for everyone who has been in this movement. They will say to God, ‘Spare him, because he loved us!’” … or don’t, if (s)he didn’t. . .
“No advocate”. . .that is a terrifying prospect, but there is hope for those who will confess and forsake their sin:
“My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.
And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments.”. . .
. . .and an Advocate Who has clearly stated, “Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it (good) unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me. . .Inasmuch as ye did it (good) not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. . .And, “Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me.
But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh! . . .
Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.
For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost. . .”
Do you ever wonder what the children the abortionists once were would think of the unjust, self-serving, atrocious mockeries of true physicians they have become?. . .what a setup for schizophrenia, among so many other serious psychological disorders that plagued the Einsatzgruppen (Nazi troops who carried out the face-to-face shooting of Jews in Eastern Europe, just as Robinson, Tiller, Yeomans, et al carry out the direct killing of little boys and girls by dismemberment, stabbing in the head & sucking out their brains, and similar atrocities.)
Another essential facet of Nazified medicine was the doctrine killing as a therapeutic imperative, so blatantly affirmed by Tiller’s lying boast, “Women need abortions and I’m going to do them.” (We don’t doubt that he intended to them; that would be the boast: the lie is in taking women’s health hostage in his war against both women and their unborn children and claiming that women “need” abortions.)
The list of true comparisons between the Nazi holocaust and the Roe v. Wade holocausts could go on almost endlessly; but these few are at the core. . .
The thing about the puppies says a lot about this woman. She hates cruelty at puppy mills but cuts up kids for a living.
You can turn her own logic against her- why don’t we say that crooked puppy mills ‘help’ the puppies? If child cruelty is just wonderful, then why not puppy abuse? It’s strange how these folks end up thinking like this…
This kind of moral schizophrenia seems endemic in the abortion industry. I suppose the only way these people can live with themselves is by pretending that they’re not killing anyone. No, quite the contrary, they’re ‘helping people.’
Rationalization and suppression of one’s conscience only works for so long, though…
When I had my abortion at Tiller’s, he didn’t even offer the fake reassurances. During my induction, after he told me not scream, I was crying and I told him that I had never been in that much pain before. And his response was, ” Well, you’ve never been pregnant before either, ” and he said it such a cruel, condescending tone that I just couldn’t believe my parents had just paid him thousands of dollars to do that to me.
The short gain of Ms. Robinson in the life of an abortionist will be overshadowed by the choruses of the unborn saints in heaven that will judge her actions here on earth…and Jesus will say to her…”Whatever you did to the least of these, you have done to me”…I believe at that moment the sword of Truth will strike her heart.Then, she will have no time to repent.Therefore,if she should happen to review this article and the postings associated with it, MAY SHE REPENT OF HER WICKED,EVIL WAYS AT ONCE. THIS IS HER TIME OF MERCY.
Interestingly, the Third Reich also gave legal protection from inhumane treatment in general, and experimentation in particular, to animals, in order, one supposes, to camouflage the monstrous society, especially the monstrous mockery of real medicine, that they created as a humane one.
The Nazi doctors and their staff, while indifferent to the medical mayhem, murder and mutilation they inflicted on their victims, were very conscientious about keeping the victims’ screams, and their plight, from reaching the outside world… several years ago, we witnessed a couple choose life and leave a Planned Parenthood facility to which they had driven from out of state for the purpose of killing the newest addition to their family for economic reasons. When asked if any specific thing had prompted the turnaround, the mother told us that while they were in the waiting room, they heard a woman screaming as though in excruciating, unbearable pain; and that the waiting room staff did nothing for the girl, but they did turn up the music in the waiting room to drown out her screaming. . .
As for Tiller’s snitty, cruel & irrelevant remark…yet another classic example of pro-abortion hypocrisy. Recall how pro-choice guys & gals alike are so fond of justifying their “women’s choice” (the flip side of that is, of course, the”man’s abandonment/abdication of responsibility) stance with the pseudo-sympathetic, “After all, a guy doesn’t know what it is like to be pregnant”. So we murder innocent children because a man can’t give something he doesn’t have…So when was Tiller EVER pregnant?
Reminds of me of the old pro-abortion rant, “2-4-6-10, why are all your leaders men?” . . .while ignoring the female pro-life leadership of Olivia Gans, Judy Brown, Penny Lea, Joan Andrews Bell, Norma McCorvey (!), Concerned Women for America, and numerous other devoted female sidewalk counselors, picketers, crisis pregnancy center volunteers, etc.; and the MALE pro-abortion leadership, beginning with Dr. Bernard Nathanson (back before his eyes were opened) and Larry Lader (actually, these two sold NOW on legal abortion as indispensable to professional equality with men…though why anyone would want to be equal to the pondscum status NOW has always designated to most if not all members of the male sex as is beyond me), the seven MALE justices who imposed Roe/Doe as the “law of the land” upon millions of American voters, preborn children, and moms in crisis who, given a real, informed choice, would have voiced a resounding NO to child slaughter, especially on demand. . . Then there are the likes of Hern, Tiller, Carhart. . .
Tina, I am so sorry that Tiller happened to you…not just the abortion itself, but his cruel, callous manner; and we all wish you the best for the fullest recovery God can give you.
just thinking,
i wish i had known orw before i went to tiller’s clinic. my abortion was absolutely horrible and i have to live with the knowledge that i was complicit in my son’s murder forever. i was in my 3rd trimester and it was purely elective. tiller’s remarks toward me were cruel, but when i look at the fact that he butchers viable children every day, what he says seems irrelevant.
“Note the peace pin, homage to the 60s”
A sign of the times? Yes, it was repopularized in the 60s as the symbol of the radical, leftist, socialist ‘counterculture’ but for centuries, it has been used to signify homage to the kingdom of Satan, and intent to lie, steal, kill and destroy. A little history lesson on Robinson’s pin, and the sympathies it expresses. . .
A broken, upside-down cross, and the Teutonic rune of death. It is also referred to as the “cross of Nero”, after the infamous Roman Emperor Reno — er, Nero, who hated Christianity, had the Apostle Peter crucified UPSIDE DOWN, and used this symbol to express his intent to destroy Christianity. This symbol is also known, variously, as the “crow’s foot”, “witch’s foot,” “sign of the broken Jew,” the “gesture of despair” and sign of “the death of man.” Revived in the sixties by hippies and others who protested nuclear weapons, Western culture, and Christian values, it is now euphemistically said to symbolize a utopian hope for a new age of global peace and earth-centered unity. While naively embraced and displayed even by some well-meaning but gravely misguided Christians, it has never lost it’s ‘Neronic’ significance as a universal symbol of evil, death, and mockery of Christ and His followers.
Germanic tribes who used it attributed mystical, occult powers to this sign, black magicians used it extensively in pagan incantations and condemnations. Even to this day, Germans recognize the inverted, broken cross — identical to the socialist’s sign of universal peace —as a ‘todersrune’, or death rune. In addition to being ordered by Hitler’s National Socialists to appear on German death notices, it was also part of the official inscription prescribed for the gravestones of the Nazi officers of the notorious deathmaking SS. This was in keeping with the Nazi emphasis on pagan mysticism.
This symbol has been a favorite among Satanists for centuries. Church of Satan founder Anton LaVey has used it as a backdrop for his altar, and a former witch has shared the following additional insight:
“It is an ancient and powerful symbol of anti-Christ. During the dark ages it was used in Druid witchcraft and by Satanists of all sorts in initiating a new member to their order. They would draw a magic(k) circle and give the initiate a cross. The initiate would then lift the cross and turn it upside down. He would then renounce Christianity in all three dimensions (sic) of time (past, present, and future) and break the horizontal pieces downward forming the design of the “Raven’s foot” [almost rhymes with Ravensbruck, certainly reminds one of it…and the millions of lives brutally trampled by that foot…] This ugly symbol is nothing short of blasphemy against the Holy Ghost. For one to wear or display this symbol is to announce, either knowingly or unknowingly, that you have rejected Christ. Remember, symbolism is picture language, and a picture is worth a thousand words.”
All this is certainly in keeping with the “comic book” (can anybody say “HATE SPEECH”?) published by Robinson’s cronies at Planned Parenthood Golden Gate.
Ok, so much for history; now for a little relevant philosophy:
“An imbecile habit has arisen in modern controversy of saying that such and such a creed can be held in one age but cannot be held in another. Some dogma, we are told, was credible in the twelfth century, but is not credible in the twentieth. You might as well say that a certain philosophy can be believed on Mondays, but cannot be believed on Tuesdays. You might as well say of a view of the cosmos that it was suitable to half-past three, but not suitable to half-past four. What a man can believe depends upon his philosophy, not upon the clock or the century. If a man believes in unalterable natural law, he cannot believe in any miracle in any age. If a man believes in a will behind law, he can believe in any miracle in any age. Suppose, for the sake of argument, we are concerned with a case of thaumaturgic healing. A materialist of the twelfth century could not believe it any more than a materialist of the twentieth century. But a Christian scientist of the twentieth century can believe it as much as a Christian of the twelfth century. It is simply a matter of a man’s theory of things. Therefore in dealing with any historical answer, the point is not whether it was given in our time, but whether it was given in answer to our question.” — G.K. Chesterton
At the heart of the “60s revolution” was the effort to replace judging the times by an absolute, transcendent standard of truth with judging the standard of truth by the times. Abortion is but one of the grosser manifestations of abandoning the truth for a subjective, me-centered “standard”; and, just as in Hitler’s time, it did not truthfully answer any of the questions it purported to address. During the 60s and into the early 70s, we heard the litany recited ad nauseam of all the “problems” legalized child-murder was supposed to solve: child abuse, world hunger, teen pregnancy, “overpopulation” (a myth from the start), right up to all the “legitimate medical aims” of embryonic stem cell research. Time for all “flower children”, whether aging or contemporary, to wake up and smell the truth: child abuse has increased at least 800%, teen pregnancy has increased, STD’s are now an epidemic due to the promiscuity promoted by the abortion profiteers and other pied pipers, world hunger is still rampant, and at least the majority of the medical evidence to date indicates that while adult stem cell research (which does not require the slaughter of the donor and, as such, is in keeping with the Nuremberg code) shows real promise of curing/treating various afflictions, embryonic stem cell research (which is used to justify the taking of innocent human lives that it requires, and thus violates the Nuremberg code) has proved to be woefully counterproductive.
Maybe instead of answers “blowin’ in the wind”, it’s time to look for those cut in stone on Mt. Sinai. They’ve stood the test of time and proven beneficial for all humanity that keeps them, not just an elitist bunch of narcissistic, bloodthirsty snobs that think that the whole planet and everything and everyone on it belongs, or should belong, to them.
Yup, this is the kind of people that were/are my agemates. Not my belief-mates, though. Glad to see that the truth still has some adherents.
Anyone else read Lewis Carroll? He wrote an essay on vivisection, in which he stated that any procedure practiced on an animal would eventually be practiced on humans, and that the damage a vivisectionist did to his own soul, by practicing cruelty, and enabling himself to both perform and promote it, was even worse than the cruelty itself. We are now seeing the fulfillment of this not only in the abortion clinics, but in the “euthanasia” movement, genetic selection, and various other areas. The point was that the end does not justify the means; a cruel or evil action always leads to more cruelty and wickedness. The illogic of the many people who oppose cruelty to animals (which is, indeed, an evil fit to be oppposed) and then promote the “right” of humans to practice cruelty toward their own offspring, is totally invisible to them.
I sometimes near despair in my attempts to shine a light on this fact. Even Christians seem to think cruelty isn’t really a serious sin, if it’s “only” toward “lower animals”, failing to see that the cruelty itself, the searing of the conscience, damages the soul of the person parcticing that cruelty.
I guess what I’m trying to say is this: the child pulling legs off grasshoppers today could easily become tomorrow’s abortionist. The student who abandons or “puts down” a pet (s)he’s no longer interested in is likely to become the kind of adult who will abandon a spouse or child(ren) when they “interfere” with the lifestyle to which (s)he wishes to be accustomed. Responsibility needs to be modeled at a lot of levels, because it will only be “caught” from models.
Why that dog loving, lesbo, hippy, commie, good for nothing so-and-so! Who does she think she is? And why am I even paying to her? Oh yeah, Operation Rescue just did a piece on an insignificant nobody and made it seem like this woman has any relevance.
Lassie, I’m not really sure what your point is (other than your last comment), but I for one see the relevance of the story. I think we can take from the story that which we want to take. I take it as a picture of some very confused people, lacking any real grounding, who, because or as a result of their failings, are killing preborn babies and/or helping others do it. It’s a sign of the times. It’s also a signal that the enemies of life are all around us, and we have to be vigilant in our dealings with others, be such dealings social or economic.
Odd that you’d use a dog’s name as your own. Why such a strange choice?
As I started reading, I thought that this story was about a woman who “saw the light” or was redeemed in some other way. As I continued on, the lack of a point or of a moral slowly became evident. This woman is a nobody, and has never done anything of any significance. And why are you people judging her? Is that not God’s job? Most of these responses are, in fact, judgements. Well, at least someone has the free time to research a random person and do a write-up on her. Regretfully, however, I had the free time to read it.
Let us not forget that Adolf Hitler was an avid dog lover. His favorite creature on earth was his beloved german shepherd. But in the end, instead of giving her to someone else who would love and care for her he had her shot in the same bunker where he and others ended their lives.
Here in San Francisco we regularly pray and counsel at Planned Parenthood Golden Gate and believe me the workers there are not loving and peaceful people.
to J Smalls,
And YOUR point would be? Murder is always of great significance, especially to the victim and his/her Maker.
Why do you claim God as the ultimate Judge when you yourself seek to derogate and censure (dare we say, “judge”?!) people who at least attempt to live according to His judgments?! Perhaps if you had more respect for precepts/judgments such as “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.”, we might take your appeal to God’s judgment a little more seriously than we take, for instance, someone who claims to be a basket of pears, Mozart, Napoleon, etc. . .
And we can’t help wondering whether you would still reference a serial killer as a mere “random” person if you were his/her targeted victim. Nothing like a vested interest, is there, J? Or, it’s so easy to be pro-choice…as long as you’re not the one “chosen”. . .
So JSmalls,
What is more judgmental than presuming to proscribe the judgments of God Himself, like you typically do here, and to pre-judge and condemn innocent children to execution, as you seem to support Robinson, et al, in doing?
And please, don’t waste your time invoking the passage about throwing stones. It is the likes of Tiller & Robinson, not ORW, who deny that they are sinners; it is their ilk, not ORW’s, who physically endanger women caught, at least as often as not, in illicit sexual relationships. It is ORW you will hear saying “Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more.” while you will hear the abortionistas encouraging more and more sexual promiscuity so there will be more unwanted babies for them to kill to keep up payments on their dream homes, gated communities, and lavish lifestyles…and, of course, to pay off all the modern Herods who keep the killing machinery all legal…
Say, doesn’t it get painful walking around all the time with shoes that belong on other feet?
And you still haven’t given any of us any reason to equate your distortions of scripture with the judgments of God. Again, what have you got against reason?
I don’t see how ya’ll can say such horrible things about a woman you don’t even know. She may stay at the clinic over night but have any of ya’ll taken into consideration thatit is because in the middle of the night someone may go into labor and it is easier for her to be there rather than getting ahold of her at a motle and having her drive down to the clinic. Dr. Robinson is a very wonderful persona dn she performed my abortion. I had NO problems what so ever and I delivered in the middle of the night. So I was very thankful she was there. I would not say that she promotes sexual promiscuity, look at the media there is where that is promoted. It seems to me it is easier to blame someone who is helping women achieve their dreams rather than take the time to talk to women who are very thankful that there are women like Dr. Robinson to help them through a though time.
When I had mine Dr. Robinson was very nice and is a Great person. Niki Thank you for taking the words right out of my mouth. and for the rest of you don’t speek untill you are in my shoes and don’t judge unless you are with out sin.