WASHINGTON, DC — Jeff White, former Operation Rescue leader, was found not guilty in the District of Columbia of keeping a dead body for the purpose of display to the public.
White was arrested at the nation’s capital for allegedly displaying the remains of a pre-born baby outside a Washington, DC, abortion clinic during the pro-abortion March for Women’s Lives in April, 2004. White was arrested and dragged away from Planned Parenthood after police confiscated the vial containing a baby’s remains. Just twenty feet away from White stood the entrance to the Washington, DC, Planned Parenthood, where, at that very moment, abortionists were dismembering babies the same size as the one White allegedly displayed.
After a 10-day trial, the judge found that the government had failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt and noted several deficiencies in the government’s prosecution of Mr. White.
Operation Rescue lead attorney, Brian Chavez-Ochoa, who represented White with the assistance of Life Legal Defense Foundation, said that the judge’s decision was well reasoned and well supported by the evidence presented at trial in finding Mr. White not guilty. “The Lord Jesus Christ deserves the credit and the glory for this victory.”
It became evident during the trial that this case revolved around the question of the humanity of the pre-born child. During closing arguments, the judge asked the government whether or not the fetus at issue was a human. The government, in response first indicated that it was, but later said that the baby was part of a human body. The government position on this issue confused even the judge and it became apparent to courtroom observers that the government prosecutor was conflicted about the issue of the humanity of the fetus.
If convicted, White would have faced up to three months in jail and a $200 fine.
Read previous story.
View photos of Jeff’s arrest.
Good job, Jeff. That’s great news! Thanks for stand*ng strongly for the preborn. There are many, many w*th us today thanks to your courage over the years.
Congratulations, Jeff, and thank you for showing the truth! I find it interesting that the prosecutor had a hard time admitting that the “fetus” is human. When one’s size, stage of development, physical condition, or location determine humanity, that leaves us all vulnerable. The Schiavo matter is a case in point.
Jeff
Thank you for standing strong. Amazing how the truth gets people stirred up. What you did was in a way very simple, showing people what really happens when a baby is killed. There are many documented accounts of people deciding not to abort after watching ultrasound pictures of their real baby. The outrage directed toward you proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that your simple illustration stirred something in people. Killing babies is *not* humane, and it is amazing how people want to hide that awful reality under the guise of ‘helping women.’ Utterly sad.
Kudos to Jeff White, and all others who dare to show the brutal facts of the abortion holocaust, in the U.S. and elsewhere. Also thanks to lawyers like Chavez-Ochoa, who dare defend the innocent, and the constitution as it was intended by its framers, for the well-being and protection of basic, legitimate human liberty & justice.
And thanks, ORW, for posting this. It is heartening and refreshing to hear that justice has not altogether departed the landscape of the all-too-defruited plain. We were beginning to wonder, in view of what has happened, and not happened, in Pinellas Park, FL, especially in the last month. (As the Schiavo case has already been referenced here, it does not seem too off-topic to pursue that theme here in a little more detail…Our post will be considerably lengthier than the preceding one referencing the murder of Terri Schindler, but we think that the matters it addresses are of vital and relevant concern to all thinking people of conscience, so we hope you’ll bear with us.)
An innocent woman was brutally executed by a P.Pk court order, while the world watched via national television. Several dozen concerned citizens, including children, were arrested for merely attempting to alleviate her sufferings at least and save her life at best by the simple act of mercy & compassion of giving water to this woman as she was dying of thirst & dehydration. Her own mother was forbidden to buffer her tortures by just placing a small ice chip on her parched lips/tongue. Her crime? Having a disability. Her biggest mistake? Marrying someone who apparently feels that his mission in life is to take terms like “rat-bastard” to unprecedented depths of meaning. (No trivial profanation intended; legitimate is as legitimate does, and nothing in this matter, done by him or his allies, is legitimate.)
We have also received a report that, apparently to add further insult to injury of those in support of Terri, her family, as well as the principles of truth, justice and legitimate freedom under attack in this outrage, another prolifer was arrested after Terri’s death, as the remaining proclaimers were packing to leave to attend the Schindler family’s memorial service for Terri. (This from a bunch who had reviled the prolifers for their “insensitivity to people in grief”…but that is only the tip of this bigoted hypocrisy iceberg.)
It seems that several prolifers continued to picket the Woodside Death Camp (a.k.a., “hospice”) for several days after Terri (a.k.a. “that b–”, according to Michael Schiavo) had died, in order to keep the record straight as to the true nature of Terri’s demise for all who passed by the murder site (including children) via signs identifying Terri’s murder as worthy of the Third Reich. Shortly before the students at Cross Bayou Elementary School (located next to the killing center, at 6886 102nd Avenue North Pinellas Park, FL 33782 ) recessed for the day, the remaining picketers were approached by Marcia Stone, the principal at C.B.E.S. riding a little golf cart, and asked to take the signs away so that the children would not see them as they left school. When the picketers dared assert their first amendment rights, she left and was soon followed by a police officer who told one of the picketers that the signs, as displayed, were in violation of certain city codes. When those directives were complied with, that officer then asked that the signs be hidden from the children. Again, the matter of the first amendment rights was brought up and the officer, bereft of a legitimate complaint, began to bully and threaten the picketers. Then he left.
Several hours later, as the proclaimers were packing their things to leave, this officer reappeared and seized the signs comparing Terri’s murder with similar acts of the Third Reich, claiming that they were “abandoned property” even though their original and rightful owner was standing right there, claiming them and requesting their return. At that point, the officer began sneering and mocking the beliefs of the picketers, and the content of the signs, saying, “Yeah, we’re all Nazis. See, my name is Schofield, and that makes me a Nazi, right?” then began to bully his target with more hostility and threats which he had cause to believe would cause emotional distress. His targeted victim tried again to reason with him and retrieve the unjustly confiscated property (it was not abandoned in a reasonable sense, since it was claimed by one HE KNEW to be the likely owner of it, and other property left there was not confiscated, because he did not object to it’s content: this was clearly a maliciously provoked arrest based on discrimination against Americans who oppose the murder of the innocent and expose those who commit such injustice.) and was arrested for obstruction of justice.
We find that in itself incredible, especially since a.) Schofield had stood or sat on duty, along with many other PPPD officers, for hours at a time, over a two-week period within some 50 yards (at the most) of a murder in progress. They all knew about it, but not one of them lifted a finger to intervene on behalf of the victim of that murder, but rather defended the murderers by arresting anyone who did try to intervene to save the innocent life under attack. b.) Schofield further offered no substantial refutation of the claims of the message he sought so vigorously to suppress. Truly, the propensity of the minions of the culture of death for unjustly projecting their own faults onto those who expose their works for what they are never ceases to amaze…or to abuse; and the first victim is justice itself in such projection.
For the record, none of the Schindler supporters we’ve corresponded with believes that all Germans are necessarily in sympathy with Nazi ideology and it’s attendant horrific agenda, either during the rule of the Third Reich or as it is resurgent in the U.S. via the eugenics and euthanasia movements. Therefore, none of them is likely to assume that a German-sounding name makes one a Nazi. However, if Schofield, Stone, Woodside, et al wish to legitimately distance themselves from Nazism/fascism, we do think that aiding and abetting the medical murder of an innocent, disabled woman, especially under a state-sanctioned “quality of life” search and destroy order, suppressing politically dissident speech and education of the public in general (including children) as to the true nature of “euthanasia”, persecuting those with opposing views, (a.k.a. GOOSESTEPPING across the U.S. Constitution and those under its rule) are not legitimate, lucid, constructive ways of doing so. Those crimes against human life, dignity, and freedom were par for the course of the Third Reich, and typical of the most ardent promoters of its resurgence in the U.S…including, but not limited to, Pinellas Park, FL.
Until plausible and profound apologies have been made by the Pinellas Park powers that be to all who supported the Terri and the rest of Schindler family in their crucible of brutal injustice, we think it is only appropriate to post a TRAVEL ADVISORY to any and all who may be considering either vacationing, or retiring, in Florida from now until this matter is justly and fully resolved, especially in Pinellas County. Do not go there unless you absolutely must, for acts of necessity or charity that cannot be attended to otherwise. Even then, purchase as many of your necessities as you can out of state, and it is NOT ADVISED to go there at all during Hurricane Season.
Pinellas County has, we’re told, been spared hurricanes for the last 4 years. We think that this may be due in part to Terri’s protection for that period. We know that Pinellas County is clearly guilty of one of the abominations that provoked YHWH to destroy the city of Sodom . “Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.” (It is especially egregious that the redfanged “quality of life” vultures who have so heinously demanded Terri’s cruel execution have sought to justify their brutal injustice by a quality of life that they have deliberately sought to diminish, not increase by denying her not just rehabilitative therapy, but even simple human decency.) “And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.” — Ezekiel 16:49,50.
While we think that a draught may be a more poetic method of justice in this case, hurricanes seem more up to the justice visited upon Sodom and Gomorrah for the sin so closely duplicated and brazenly flaunted in, and by, Pinellas County and others.
This advisory applies especially to women, to those who are disabled, over the age of 40, those who could become disabled or incapacitated. (That would be everyone).
Also, parents who don’t want their children to grow up to be brownshirts! One female deputy in the Pinellas County Jail had the mindless audacity to berate one prolife inmate for “disrupting the routine” of the schoolchildren! This seemed a common sentiment in Pinellas County. While we recognize that routines have their place in the creation and maintenance of a civilized society, especially where the foundations of children’s lives are being laid, we somehow find the notion that the murder of an innocent human being should be routinely treated as a non-event, unworthy of emergency alarms and related measures, (such as the police intervention that never materialized on behalf of the victim) to be extremely counter-productive of a society that reflects the warmth and beauty we had heretofore associated with Florida, and equally productive of the cold brutality and ugliness history has rightly associated with the Third Reich.
One very poignant photo appeared in a recent issue of Human Events newsmag. It showed several children preparing to try to get water to Terri and therefore facing arrest at Woodside killing chambers. In the picture you can see part of a PPPD squad car disingenuously claiming, “Serving our Community”. WRONG. Any community is only as well-served as it’s weakest, most vulnerable members. Until Terri’s murder has been fully and justly vindicated, and the culture of death thoroughly expunged from Florida’s courts, law enforcement agencies, medical facilities, schools and other venues of power and influence (where it counts), we think it only appropriate for the Pinellas County squad cars to read, “serving our community’s vulnerable to our community’s predators on a silver platter.” — or simply, “serving our community’s predators”.
Perhaps the alleged concerns & vicious gripes of Pinellas County residents, police, and other authorities about protesters “upsetting children” would make some sense if the signs identifying Woodside as a killing place similar to Auschwitz weren’t provoked by actions reflecting the ideology and methodology of Auschwitz. But that is not the case; if it were, many people would not have felt obliged to disrupt and lay down their own lives to do what they could to prevent and expose these atrocities; and anyone who deliberately covers up violence, rather than warning the community in which it occurred of it, is not serving that community; (again, including children.)
According to one prolife witness who served time in the Pinellas County Jail, the contempt of the deputies and other workers there for pro-Terri (and therefore anti-injustice, anti-barbarism, etc.) was so thick you could cut it with a knife. True foxes guarding the proverbial henhouse. (A number of prolife witnesses who were arrested were more or less browbeaten into “no contest” pleas, by not being allowed to contact their attorneys before having to enter a plea, thus forfeiting any right to appeal these outrages. Anyone knowing of real legal help available for such individuals, please send to ORW, to be sent to us, so we can spread the word as needed. This would obviously NOT include the deluge of ‘ambulance-chasing’ advertisements from Pinellas County attorneys that has greeted these people upon their return to their respective homes.
One last advisory: Anyone who has, in response to the outrage perpetrated against Terri and the Schindler family, gone out and gotten a “living will” or is considering doing so: This would now be accurately called a “lemming will”, as so many people seem to be rushing, like lemmings, to their “directed” deaths as planned and played by the Euthanasia movement’s pied pipers. DON’T DO IT. Terri was not “allowed to die with dignity”, she was murdered. Death with dignity in her case, especially, would have been to give her parents custody of her care, and let God take her in HIS time, in HIS way. (Hint: His way is never to put an innocent person to death.)
It is especially cruel to Terri’s memory to exploit her brutal murder to further the agenda that destroyed her, and is loathsome to her own beliefs, those of her real family, and those of all thinking people of conscience. The “living will” is an invention of the prodeath movement created and calculated to condition Americans (and others) into letting the state & medical professions arrogate to themselves the right to kill people based on their own, anti-Christian “quality of life” judgments. (Can you see the lions being loosed in the arena? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist…) DON’T BUY THIS LIE. The American Life League (all.org) has well-researched information on this. They also have a LOVING WILL, and end-of-life/incapacity advance directive alternative to the prodeath’s living/lemming will that respects the loving will of God, and is intended to counter, rather than usher in, the Nazi-like “Final Solution” Phase 2. Right to Life also has a similar directive called the “Will to Live”, as does the Human Life Alliance (see humanlife.org).
We strongly recommend that all these options be examined, and the most protective one put into effect immediately, to help protect ourselves, our loved ones, our nation and, hopefully, our world from the scam and holocaust that Terri’s case has sought to expose.
We certainly hope that the travel advisory posted here doesn’t last long; it’s not the sort of warning one likes feeling obliged to post in “the land of liberty and justice for all”.
Also, we are aware that the actions of some police officers do not necessarily reflect the attitudes & attendant M.O.’s of all, and that some law enforcement officers in Pinellas County, and other parts of Florida, have probably been just as grieved, just as horrified, at Terri’s unjust, inhumane murder and the intense emotional cruelty perpetrated on her real family (that would be the Schindlers, not the Schiavos, despite the glamourization of Michael Schiavo as “compassionate”, “grieved”, “loving”, etc., ad nauseam that we have come to expect from the prodeath lapdogs in some media sectors…you know who you are)through this. Even those officers involved in arresting people for trying to do save the innocent from, or warn others of, danger, may have taken out your own angst, shame at being court-ordered to do the exact opposite of what you were presumably sworn and reasonably expected by Americans to do: defend the U.S. Constitution, the Florida Constitution, (both were goosestepped all over by Greer, et al), and to protect and serve the innocent. We hope for your sakes that you are never put in this situation again, and that you will do all you can and then some to see that others are not murdered, or further victimized, because they are incapacitated, despised, or other circumstances beyond their reasonable control.
If we have misjudged you, we will happily stand peacefully corrected, but we would like stronger evidence of that than the complaints referenced here. FAIR ENOUGH?
Again, Jeff White, ORW, and friends…KEEP STORMING THE GATES.
ORW, sorry we missed you in FL; seems you’d just left shortly before we got there. Hope to see you soon, and under freer, more just, circumstances.
God’s best to all of you
A number of posts have been removed for being off topic. We encourage you to remove the discussion to our Forum, which is a more appropriate venue for extended debates. Thank you!
http://www.operationrescue.org/forum/
Very gutsy of Jeff, ORW and others who dare to seek to educate a culture that seems to favor indoctrination over education.
With regard to Cross Bayou Elementary School (and others), we’re told that one day, after Terri had died, a student walking past the killing center asked his teacher why there was only one protester remaining. The teacher is said to have replied, “One is enough”. Great message to send impressionable children, that people who oppose and expose the murder of the innocent and vulnerable should be drastically reduced.
C.S. Lewis’s words, “We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful.” come loudly and clearly to mind, and one can only imagine how loudly and clearly that teacher’s words may one day haunt her, especially if she finds herself aging, and at the mercilessness of the pupil she thus helped save from mercifulness towards the weak and helpless.
For those in Pinellas Park and elsewhere with eyes to see, ears to hear, voices to speak and hearts that care, here is much better instruction, by a much better teacher, related to Woodside and other Killing Centers. May a word to Cross Bayou Elementary School parents and teachers suffice…
The Crooked Road
Our society did not just suddenly stumble onto the Terri Schiavo case. The sordid specter of a government resolutely condemning an innocent citizen to death by starvation and dehydration is the end result of a very long and tortured process. Judge George Greer did not concoct such a brazen and perverse wickedness all on his own.
The ever insightful Ben House has reviewed a chilling book that attempts to trace at least part of that long and crooked road. It makes for difficult but necessary reading:
I like to read, and I especially enjoy reading history. Yet sometimes reading is a grim burden. There are those books, subjects, and studies, which fulfill an intellectual curiosity, but depress the spirit. All centuries and eras have their dark clouds, but the Twentieth Century was especially known for human horrors and evils. From concentration camps to gulags, from Nazis to Communists, from aerial bombing to genocide, the means and extent of the human capacity for evil seemed boundless in the last century. Technology and human accomplishments seemed to herald a golden age in 1900. The golden age was soon mired up in the trenches of World War I, the tramping feet of soldiers in the dark valley of World War II, and the iron and bamboo curtains of Communism lasting throughout much of the century.
The Christian teacher and writer must confront these evils. Like Dante’s journey through the Inferno, he must descend from depth to depth examining the evidences and artifacts of human depravity practiced by wicked regimes. We are compelled to better understand what turned a Catholic choirboy and an Orthodox seminary student into Hitler and Stalin. And they did not act alone, so we have to figure what dynamics created Goebbels and Himmler, Beria and Molotov. What sycophantic forces create legions of immoral monsters to surround such men as Hitler and Stalin? We also have to read the accounts of those who suffered. The victims, immortalized in the writings of Solzhenitsyn and the diaries of Anne Frank, must be remembered. Human suffering, not a comfortable subject, must be remembered by those who live in comfort. Yes, even the good guys, like the United States and Great Britain, have their dark secrets. Aspects of the Boer War waged by Great Britain and racial atrocities in America cannot be ignored just because they dint our pristine armor.
Grim books must be read. One such recent reading of mine was From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany by Richard Weikart (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004). This book, sober and academic, focused on root causes of the Holocaust. It examined ideas, academic communities, intellectual ponderings, arcane journal studies, and obscure (to us now) scientific, political, and ethical trends among the educated elite. This survey of German thought in the late 1800s and early 1900s would be useful only to academic specialists (meaning, Ph.D. candidates in search of a minor point) were it not for the sequel to the story. The story itself is the initial impact of Darwinian thought on issues of ethics and morality. Darwin’s works caused an awakening, an enlightenment, for many found a liberation in Darwinism from the restraints of the older Christian-natural law consensus. The sequel was the rise of the Third Reich and Hitler in the 1930s. The issue is this: Was their a connection between the student in the early 1900s reading Darwin and asking, “How should we then live?” and his son attending a rally at Nuremberg thirty years later?
Linking your enemies to Hitler is an overused and much abused tactic. I have seen pictures of both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, presented by their enemies, showing them caught in the midst of a wave looking like they were giving Nazi salutes. Any position, any viewpoint, any program can be discredited by linking it to Nazism. Opponents to Darwin in our day, whether committed Creationists or some form of Intelligent Design supporters, have frequently been dismissed out of court for lacking scientific credentials and intellectual seriousness. Meaning, if you doubt Darwinism, you are by definition stupid. (Dr. Richard Weikart, by the way, is an associate professor of history at California State University, but that is irrelevant if Darwin is questioned.) What is the value in this debate of using the Hitler card?
First, we need to note where we are in the long-term battle between proponents of evolution and believers in some form of creation. The battle of Yorktown took place two years before the Treaty of Paris was signed. Likewise opponents of evolution have won some decisive victories, even though the war continues. Surely, there have been hard fought skirmishes along the way. Chesterton and Spencer debated in England over a century ago. William Jennings Bryan and Clarence Darrow duked it out in Dayton, Tennessee in the 1920s. Science faculties fought state legislatures, clergymen railed against scientists, parents protested against textbooks, and so on it went. We so often assume the Darwinists have won the day. Public school textbooks tow the party line, regardless of what stickers are affixed to the book or what verbal tricks are used to tone down the language. College professors hold to Darwinism with the tenacity of a medieval monk reciting his prayers. Endless scientific documentaries, especially those featuring animals, regale us with evolutionary dogma. Even most Christian colleges blush when a freshman gullibly mentions 6-day creation in mixed (that is, secular and Christian) company. We know the catechism question: “What do all credible, educated scientists believe” Answer: “Evolution is our god and Darwin is his prophet.”
Yet, we as Christians do not notice that the enemy has pulled behind its academic Maginot Line and made concessions on the implications of Darwinism to ethics and public policy. The biology professor might not allow for any objections to Darwinism inside the confines of his classroom. But don’t take the biology book to sociology class or to political science class or to ethics class. Like a body part in a Picasso painting, Darwinism is not to be attached to the rest of the body of human thought in a rational traditional way. This refusal to apply Darwinism to all of life was not always the case. First it was necessary that the university be replaced by the multiversity.
Darwinism was dangerous in the day of the university. When Ernst Haeckel or Herbert Spencer read Darwin, their minds—still a product of a fading Christian consensus—adhered to a unity of truth. Therefore, men sought for a university education, a universal search for truth, a unifying principle of reality. For this reason, many people were born again upon accepting Darwin. Darwin offered not just biology, but philosophy, a worldview. At last an alternative to Christianity was offered. Darwin’s book was a best seller to a world longing for liberation. Darwin’s early disciples grasped the implications of his gospel quite quickly.
Sparks were flying in the academic circles, especially in Germany. Germany was brimming with brilliant minds and a nationalistic will-to-power. The higher critics were leading the world in theological studies, leading even the most conservative branches of Christian churches to send its best to Germany to study theology. Some of these same higher critical were furiously undermining the foundations of Christianity. “God is on life-support and the Bible contains errors” was proclaimed in the theology department, while across the walkway in the science department, similarities were noted between the embryos of frogs and the students’ baby brothers.
There was a German propensity for producing the best, for accentuating the finest. This resulted in amazing technology and craftsmanship, and when this tendency wedded science and social policy, the proto-Third Reich was born in the minds of men. But for the time, it was only words and paper competing against the older ethic, once carved on stone. A new science, in a new country, with a new worldview created the genesis of a new ethics and a new version of what constitutes a healthy society. We are all bothered by the sufferings and miseries of the incurably ill, the elderly, the infirm, and the hopelessly insane. They are inconvenient. They tie us down. They do not produce anything for the common welfare. The new ethic suggested that it was more moral to dispose of such people than to be inconvenienced. The older Genesis account proclaimed man made in God’s image; the new Genesis divided man into categories of fit and unfit.
Slower, sicker, weaker animals die in the pack. Either they are killed as prey or they are unable to kill prey. This benefits the herd or the pack, and so surely benefits the tribe. Of course, all this was academic debate: The meanderings of scholars were loosed upon the pages of a journal or in the company of his fellows at conferences. Still iron sharpens iron. One scholar influenced another. Each book sparked another flurry of articles. Each lecture raised questions of further implications and applications. Just the merry life of professors—debating and arguing—and passing on to their students the findings of their research.
World War I upset many of these scholars. Although in one sense, the killing of thousands by the incessant machine gunning and poison gas might seem just another phase of the fit eliminating the unfit, still the war was troublesome. As Weikart says, “… what they found objectionable about modern wars was that the wrong people were being killed—the strong and the healthy rather than the weak and sickly.” Merely disposing of useless individuals and inferior races was helpful, but white Europeans slaughtering one another was unacceptable. Then out of the ashes, the destruction, and despair of Germany’s defeat, Hitler arose. Hitler was not a scholar, although he was not stupid either. Like many of us, he picked up the major parts of his worldview second and third-hand. Whether he ever read Darwin or Darwin’s pupils is irrelevant. Ideas have consequences and intellectuals change nations and arcane philosophies translate into political agendas. Many followers of Darwin opposed Hitler and some died under his regime. Still as Weikart points out, “No matter how crooked the road from Darwin to Hitler, clearly Darwinism and eugenics smoothed the path for Nazi ideology, especially for the Nazi stress on expansion, war, racial struggle, and racial extermination.”
This crooked road wound through the university. Thankfully, for a season, that institution no longer exists. Fragmentation of reality has replaced universal truth, and multiversities have replaced universities. Just suggest to your biology professor that our race (any race) is superior. Propose to your political science professor that we purify the land. “Don’t you dare apply Darwinism to politics,” they will angrily reply. Did you forget that politics and religion don’t mix?
Yes, we still have our expendables. Aborted children are dispensed with by denying them the rights of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” The sick and mentally incapable are at risk in our nation. The ethics of the university campus still reach the grammar school classrooms all too quickly. Yet, the Darwinists, who are many in number, are tightlipped when it comes to ethics. It is absurd to link the truth of “Survival of the Fittest” with horrors of the Third Reich. Their silence about the implications of Darwinism says too much.
Richard Weikart’s book is filled with many brilliant insights, quotes, and references. Scholars out there, like Weikart, are doing in academic circles what bloggers are doing to the media. This is not pleasant reading. This is not the delightful read to have at the bedside. Not a lot of people will read this book. But for those of us who teach, who preach, and who pound away at our computers, this is a book we need to know.
the foregoing, “the crooked road”, is from Dr. George Grant’s blog at kingsmeadow.com. Sorry!
Bummer! To think that a $200 dollar fine would have over turned roe. The victory would have been a conviction. But it does go to show that the Gov. stance on this issue resembles what is found on the ground in a hen house.