Comments on: UPDATE: Botched Abortion Victim Sues Troubled NJ Abortion Mill

By: 4life

4life — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:19:22 +0000

I wanted to add;The femenists have also corrupted women and warped their minds.Nowadays we put families,motherhood,and fatherhood on the back burner.It’s all about working women,money.Who can land a man that makes $$$! Pressure for women to be stick-thin. People buy into this. Women are told”Hey,who needs a man?”and men are told”Who needs a woman??”To Echo what Alayna said;thus comes into play-casual sex.I personally know of several women that went to the abortion clinic after their sexual escapades were finished.They made it clear that the sex part was wonderful,but a baby??Forget about it!!It’s all just very,very sad.

By: Kelly

Kelly — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:47:34 +0000

I enjoyed reading your post Alayna.It was very well written! I learned from it for myself as well.It’s too bad that this isn’t taught in most families. It would be most helpful. Women do buy into a lot of this bs today. It’s easy to lose site of who we really are.With nothing but sex,sex,and more sex on the tube today-I can see where a lot of people can lose their way.Thanks again for a really great post that makes us think.

By: Alayna Staggers nurse

Alayna Staggers nurse — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:47:43 +0000

Maybe we need to place importance on motherhood and family values. Young girls see plenty of examples of sexuality to emulate and chastity is a word seldom heard.
Sex is emphasized everywhere you look, and attracting the opposite sex is foremost in a lot of girls mind. And then of course, they have to figure out how to “keep the guy.” Motherhood is something they figure will happen at the end. Since marriage is not as popular or necessary for a sexual relationship, girls are desperate to find a means to maintain a relationship. Men do not have to commit to a relationship because sex is so readily available. Everyone has suffered the consequences of the freedom of our modern day thinking. The family as we once knew it has disintegrated. The one thing that hasn’t changed, babies are created from these uncertain relationships which noone wants to take responsibility for.
Casual sex is at the root of the problem. If girls were taught to value themselves more, maybe they wouldn’t be giving their bodies to just anyone. Lack of self esteem in young girls is more rampant than ever. If “freedom of choice” is so popular, why do women feel so badly about theselves? We have created a “no boundaries mentality,”
and as a result the respect for women no longer exists.
Although women should have the same rights as men, the feminist movement has reduced our society to a degregation of women, motherhood and family in general.
Now, anything goes! Women have bought into the idea.
They don’t seem to know any better today; that their bodies are a temple of God, bought and paid for with the price of Jesus blood. Most would laugh at that. How can men respect women when they so easily succumb to easy sex and abortion on demand. Men have no reason to get married, and they especially don’t want the responsibility of a child from a casual sexual experience. The babies suffer the consequences of our immorality. If people feel they must engage in this lifestyle, they need to make sure they do not conceive a life. Babies should not be punished for the irresponsibility of our actions. Yes, I do believe we are becoming less patient and understanding of mothers who give their bodies over for illicit sex and then to the abortionist. The issue is that sex is so exalted in our world and the importance of motherhood and family is devalued. The emphasis should be on teaching young girls that they are special and worthy of being treated with respect. To provide birth control and assume that all girls are going to have sex, only promotes the idea that they are already devalued and it is permissable for the guys to go ahead and use them for the only thing they are worth. Sex without commitment only leaves women feeling alone and insecure, no matter what their age. Committment is the basis for conceiving a child. There is none, so that’s why we have abortion. Abortion is only the result of our years of conditioning that women should enjoy the same sexual freedom as men, and men have taken advantage of that. How is it that women have aquired the idea that a man is more important than a baby? Have you ever noticed how they actually “run” into the abortion clinic? Often the man drives off and comes back after it is all over! I presume all she is thinking of, is “getting back to her lifestyle, uninterrupted.” Promotion of better self esteem in girls should be part of the sex education received. Recognition of basic family values and the importance of motherhood needs to be emphasized. If one so chooses to indulge in premarital sex, use contraception. Why not? It’s better than abortion!

By: All_Life_IS_Precious

All_Life_IS_Precious — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:26:25 +0000

Does this woman’s children know the reason for her being in the hospital? That she killed their baby brother or sister?

She could have placed the baby for adoption. He or she would have two loving parents.

I only feel a little bit sorry for this woman. She made a horrible choice and look at the consequences she has to face.

And PP still hypes abortion as “Safe”.

By: Kelly

Kelly — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:18:50 +0000

While we’re on the subject,I must share this. A woman I knew admitted to having 8 abortions-yes-8! She had 1 living child. She eventually had to undergo an emergency hysterectomy. She confided to me that the hysterectomy left her feeling very depressed. I was a tad shocked, and I asked her why she chose to have so many abortions. She replied that she never felt that she needed to use protection because of easy access to abortion. She went on to say that she did want more children when the time was right.Needless to say I felt no sympathy.Not when all of these childless couples want babies.Not when I know of women that have grieved over miscarriages.Not when I know of women that kept their children and told me that murder was not an option.I was glad that there was divine intervention in the case of that woman I knew.She wont be having another abortion in this life.She came off as being selfish once more.She would have kids when she was ready.Not anymore.Perhaps at 20 years old and 2 children later,Rasheedah should have considered a tubal ligation. Too late now.

By: Robert Ferguson

Robert Ferguson — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:31:47 +0000

It’s important to get botched abortions and deaths in to the public record!

Jack Schuler for malpractice
SchulerBrownLaw@aol.com

Jack was the attorny that worked on Diana Lopez death. She was a friend of my daughter who died at PP in East LA and left two children.

If not for the lawsuit ALL info would have been hidden, even who the abortionist was.

Check out this website for more info. on her death and the importance of public records.

http://www.angelfire.com/ex/dianalopez/

Sueing abortionists to get money is not the primary
objective of a good prolife attorney though it sure helps. It costs alot of money to do these things.

Botched abortion clients are sought to get INTO the record, the botched abortions that are mostly hidden with big dollar pay offs in a confidential settlement. The baby killer has his attroneys go to the hospitals and get a settlement AS SOON AS POSSIBLE! They can
be there within the hour.

The SOP with one baby killer who has deaths that I know of and many malpractice lawsuits is to have his attorney at the bedside w/ cash money and a check book taking care of the family’s needs as soon as possible. Their goal is to get a confidentiality agreement.

When you’re talking about a poor black woman from south Centeral LA who does not have a pot to p^ss in…This may cost as little as keys to a new car and a few bucks.

It is so difficult for the sidewalk ministry team to be able to get a prolife attorney to the hospital to be able to stop this sort of silencing game.

The baby killer knows WHERE the victim is going. We have no idea- nor do we even know her name.

We have to follow the ambulance, and hope to get some info from a source at these hospitals. THEN call the LIFE friendly attorney.

There is a good set of attorney’s who sue baby killers and help protect and defend sidewalk ministers for life.

Jack Schuler for malpractice
SchulerBrownLaw@aol.com

Ackerman
http://www.usjf.net

Short
http://www.lldf.org

Life Legal is involved in a big lawsuit right now against PP over the NON REPORTING of a rape on a 13 year old who had an abortion there. They are in need of funding- to be able to get the records into public record. Suppenas, depositions, etc… all cost big bucks, especially when dealing with a billion dollar PP.

http://www.lldf.org

By: Robert Ferguson

Robert Ferguson — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:10:53 +0000

Frank,

Sueing abortionists to get money is not the primary
objective of a good prolife attorney.

Botched abortion clients are sought to get INTO the record, the botched abortions that are mostly hidden with big dollar pay offs in a confidential settlement. The baby kiler has his attroneys go to the hospitals and get a settlement AS SOON AS POSSIBLE! They canbe there within the hour.

When you’re talking about a poor black woman from south Centeral LA who does not have a pot to p^ss in…This may cost as little as keys to a new car and a few bucks.

It is so difficult for the sidewalk ministry team to be able to get a prolife attorney to the hospital to be able to stop this sort of silencing game. The baby killer knows

There is a good set of attorney’s who sue baby killers.

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:47:15 +0000

I’m glad someone actually said “the baby is dead and in a trash can”…(not that we all didn’t think that anyway…)
and now poor mama is injured and wants a ton of cash for what SHE went through.

She already had 2 children? Obviously she knows what happens when you have sex.

I’m sorry, but I have a HUGE problem with her cashing in on the consequences of her “choice”. This entire situation is a classic example of how SHE should have researched the risks involved in her “choice”. She’s 20 years old…she should have been more responsible from the get go. Call it “judging” or whatever…but the fact remains…she made her bed, now she’ll have to lay in it.

I find it hard to have sympathy for her.
One thing’s for sure…she won’t be having any more abortions.

Just HOW exactly are we SUPPOSED to react to this???

By: Kelly

Kelly — Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:33:12 +0000

Frank,I agree with you. I don’t mean to sound cold. It just sounds so unfair to me.I think that most women KNOW that abortion is murder.They are selfish people that want their problem to go away.Heaven forbid that anything happen to them.Now begins the outcry for the injured woman.The baby is dead and in a garbage can somewhere.Is anyone crying out for him? I doubt it,considering that he didn’t matter to his mother anyway.Now we want our cash.I don’t have a clue as to how this woman feels about her abortion,and I know I shouldn’t judge her,but I just don’t feel that it’s right for her to keep any lawsuit cash rewards.

By: Frank

Frank — Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:38:05 +0000

Kelly writes, “Then when things go wrong for the woman,she is now able to win tons of cash and be rewarded.That money should go to her medical bills only.The rest ought to go to a pro-life group/cause so that other babies and women wont have to die.”

–Sounds great but unfortunately it won’t happen this way. That’s why I am very suspicious about lawsuits against these abortion clinics, and why to a great extent I agree with Kelly’s posts regarding Rasheedah. IMHO, shes may or may not just be looking for a big cash score.

–In that vein, I’m curious: Who are the lawyers representing these plaintiffs? Are we talking about Jay Alan Sekulow, Esq., the American Center for Law & Justice, and/or some other well-known, pro-life, conservative lawyers who might sue an abortion clinic “pro bono” i.e. for free? I suspect not. I instead suspect we’re talking about garden-variety “plaintiff’s personal injury lawyers” who are paid a percentage of their recovery for their client.

–Worse, NJ has made a cottage injury of lawsuits for “wrongful life,” i.e. a parent says “my child was deformed, I would have aborted had I been told this while I was pregnant.” In those cases, parents can not only recover the costs of raising the child, but for their own “pain and suffering” of having to bear and raise the child (!) (if I understand the state of the law correctly). So let’s not be too quick to paint Rasheedah as entirely innocent, okay? I think we need more facts.