Comments on: Truth Truck Attends Giuliani Fundraisers

By: Marie

Marie — Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:56:12 +0000

Both sides have liars but more as democrats…this is a spiritual war and we must pray and only God can help us !! Have you noticed the garbage on Tv in morals since abortion became law ? Do you see on TV how graphic the murders are? It is a school to teach murder !! I am 74 and I remember how America was in the 50′s It was such a great place to live…we were the envy of the world. I am a RN and I firmily belive that our decline in morals started when abortion was legal. We must clean out Congress. use a report card and fire them after one yr on trial for his job. thay are not accoutable. If we don’t clean America, God Will SOON !!
PLEASE AMERICA GET ON YOUR KNEES TODAY AND GOD WILL ANSWER OUR PRAYER. WE ARE A FAVORED NATION.

By: bill

bill — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:30:15 +0000

It’s called politics people. The Republicans used us, and like the suckers we are we fell for it. The fact is Giuliani is going to be the republican candidate, and he is going to sell us out. Welcome to the future.

By: Racko

Racko — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:24:23 +0000

Giuliani i dont like. elct ann colter

By: John Francis Borra

John Francis Borra — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:36:07 +0000

If there’s gonna be someone on the ballot who’ll protect the unborn, great. We’re obliged to vote for him.

Trouble is, I don’t know if there’s any current Republican hopeful who’s completely in line with comprehensive, Catholic teaching on life issues. I believe Brownback was 100%; after him, if I’m not mistaken, they start drifting away. (That might not be fair to Trancredo, though; I don’t recall.)

Will we find anyone perfect? I doubt it; this is the nature of politics and society. Does that mean we can’t vote for someone who’s not 100% and have a clear conscience? Certainly not.

It’s a matter of voting for the best choice in the field vis a vis the preeminent right to life– the one most likely to protect (least likely to do harm to) the human person. This is the underlying Judeo-Christian imperative, recently reiterated by Benedict XVI and, just last week, by the US bishops.

By: Randy Crawford

Randy Crawford — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 06:32:44 +0000

There is no reason to vote for either Hellary or Ghouliani. The babies are dead either way. Would you care whether you were vivisected and dismembered through Democrat dogma or Republican “principles” that aren’t observed? Obviously, it makes no difference to the millions of dead babies either way, so if these two criminals are the ultimate choices, a vote for “none of the above” will send a signal useful toward the 2012 election, because if only murderers are nominated in 2008, nobody can win for now anyway. Hellary isn’t any worse, she just would make it easier for people to understand the problem in coming years were she to become the next president. People need to be thinking more about the long-range future.
As to the larger picture right now, all the pandering Democrat candidates are baby-butcher enablers, and Romney as a “recent convert” (who is only pretending, and trolling for suckers) is in many ways worse than Hellary. He’s just a better actor, but still not good enough to fool everybody. Thompson and McCain are slightly better, but since they have to tell us “how conservative” they are with words rather than specifics and ample deeds, it is obvious the superior choices are Huckabee, Tancredo, Paul, and Hunter.
If you ever cast a vote for someone who is willing to kill helpless babies, you can then voice all the lame excuses you want, but you know you have innocent blood on your hands.

By: Steven

Steven — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:03:37 +0000

We must also consider that a president can be pro-life, in reality, yet not be a good leader on other very important issues. Jesus was not just prolife, He was pro-entire-person. Need I say more. Also, Christian groups have historically supported a particular candidate (if not directly, then by implication) which can sometimes get people’s focus away from the real issues. Bush-Cheney-Rove-ism is not the same as Christianity. And the Democratic party is not all evil either. Consider Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska — former youth pastor, one of the most consistent prolife voices in the Senate, and the only Democrat to oppose the embryonic stem cell proposal. He is also the only US Senator I am aware of who has publically proclaimed that we need to get the Bible back in the public schools. We all need to get flat on our faces and pray about what to do in 2008. I am clueless about who to vote for, and not voting is unacceptable.

By: cw

cw — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:16:34 +0000

Oh and to add to my previous comments, I wanted to mention a conversation I once had with a Bush-supporting prolifer in front of an abortion mill one day…. When I brought up Bush’s support for making Plan B over the counter, the man said “Well he had to do that in order to get his FDA nominee through…” This is a prolifer who has witnessed on the streets for twenty years. He attempted to justify a pro-abortion action by a self-proclaimed “prolife president.” I was utterly speechless. I could not even think of a response.

By: cw

cw — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:08:58 +0000

Sarah and Heywood, excellent points. I really think that during the two terms of our “prolife president,” common every day prolifers have definitely become lax. They cheer for him. They say “we have to support our prolife president.” They say “Well let’s just work harder to get more Republicans elected next time…” They think that one day, Bush will just fix the problem. Well, January 20, 2009 will be here before we know it and Bush will have done nothing more than the little bit he has done now.

Besides Bush, we had a Republican controlled Congress from 1994 through 2006. Between a Republican president (from 2001 on) and the Republican Congress (through 2006), nothing happened to put much of a squeeze on abortion.

Frankly, considering how the Republicans have abused conservatives, I wouldn’t mind it one bit if they went the way of the Whigs. I’m frightened about the prospects of any of the Democrat candidates winning in November 2008. But prolifers will hopefully then begin to realize they can’t expect any help from politicians. In that case, hopefully prolifers will realize it is up to them to do things like peacefully witness near the abortion mills, write letters to the editor of newspapers, talk about these issues on the Internet, etc. And, while they’re at it, call their elected representatives and ask why they continue to coddle the abortion industry.

By: John Francis Borra

John Francis Borra — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:28:37 +0000

cw–

I agree with just about everything you say.

Bush’s “compromise” on Plan B was atrocious; so was his earlier allowance of the use of existing stem cell lines. And why has it taken so long for Republicans in DC to raise objections to federal funding of Planned Parenthood? PPFA is, for all practical purposes, a federal agency; one third of its income is from our tax dollars!

Again, there are reasons I’m no longer a Republican.

I could see this sorta thing coming years ago, back during the Reagan era, when so many voters were jumping on the GOP bandwagon. As the “tent” grew, it began taking in all sorts; to maintain popularity, they were tempted to water things down.

Much of the party has become morally copmpromised, as the Democrats long have been.

By: Heywood Jalisson

Heywood Jalisson — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:30:17 +0000

If the president has to be a pro-abort, then I hope it’s a Democrat. Republicans will not get serious about ending abortion (not just talking about it) when voters keep electing them because (take your pick) they are the lesser of two evils, they are Republicans, etc., etc.