<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Salk Institute Grows Human Brain Cells in Mice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/salk-institute-grows-human-brain-cells-in-rats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/salk-institute-grows-human-brain-cells-in-rats/</link>
	<description>Operation Rescue® is one of the leading pro-life Christian activist organizations in the nation and has become the voice of the pro-life activist movement in America. Its activities are on the cutting edge of the abortion issue, taking direct action to restore legal personhood to the pre-born and stop abortion in obedience to biblical mandates.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:18:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/salk-institute-grows-human-brain-cells-in-rats/comment-page-1/#comment-4793</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=310#comment-4793</guid>
		<description>If you kount phorty [40 is thought to be the number for generation in the scripture] words down in the konstitootion, you will find the word posterity. Posterity means future jenerations.


Our 4fathers made a kontract with U.S. sitizens to secure the blessings of the Creator God for &quot;our posterity&quot;. A pre-born is protected by the konsitootion, being a future jeneration, not kondemned to die by it.

&quot;We the people&quot; have allowed the enemies of God, and the konstitooshion , to hyjack our goverment, and distroy the Konstitooshion, and if we don&#039;t do something kwick, they wil distroy amurica as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you kount phorty [40 is thought to be the number for generation in the scripture] words down in the konstitootion, you will find the word posterity. Posterity means future jenerations.</p>
<p>Our 4fathers made a kontract with U.S. sitizens to secure the blessings of the Creator God for &#8220;our posterity&#8221;. A pre-born is protected by the konsitootion, being a future jeneration, not kondemned to die by it.</p>
<p>&#8220;We the people&#8221; have allowed the enemies of God, and the konstitooshion , to hyjack our goverment, and distroy the Konstitooshion, and if we don&#8217;t do something kwick, they wil distroy amurica as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/salk-institute-grows-human-brain-cells-in-rats/comment-page-1/#comment-4788</link>
		<dc:creator>Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 21:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=310#comment-4788</guid>
		<description>Phil says:  &quot;Please, people. Let&#8217;s at least use proper English. &#8220;Proabort&#8221; is not a noun.&quot;

Well Phil, if that&#039;s the best you can come up with as a diversionary tactic to keep from addressing my post, all I can say is NO WONDER THE PROABORTS ARE LOSING!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil says:  &#8220;Please, people. Let&rsquo;s at least use proper English. &#8220;Proabort&#8221; is not a noun.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well Phil, if that&#8217;s the best you can come up with as a diversionary tactic to keep from addressing my post, all I can say is NO WONDER THE PROABORTS ARE LOSING!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/salk-institute-grows-human-brain-cells-in-rats/comment-page-1/#comment-4784</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 18:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=310#comment-4784</guid>
		<description>Yes, let&#039;s use proper English. Good grammar and spelling are important to a good discussion. 

Other important factors include truth, honesty, logic, and the ability to learn from our mistakes and humbly face the facts. 

So, Phil, do you have any *other* response to Doyle&#039;s comment? Other than to correct him for using a slang term? I notice you didn&#039;t correct shenanigans for using the slang term &quot;heck&quot; or Robert for using &quot;hmmm&quot;--is proper English only important when the slang term is used in the context of correcting YOUR mistake? 

Or was it not a mistake at all--was it a deliberate tactic? A &quot;proabort&quot; tactic? (If I put the slang term in quotations, *then* is it okay to use slang?) You need to quit nit-picking and address the serious point made in contradiction of your assertion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, let&#8217;s use proper English. Good grammar and spelling are important to a good discussion. </p>
<p>Other important factors include truth, honesty, logic, and the ability to learn from our mistakes and humbly face the facts. </p>
<p>So, Phil, do you have any *other* response to Doyle&#8217;s comment? Other than to correct him for using a slang term? I notice you didn&#8217;t correct shenanigans for using the slang term &#8220;heck&#8221; or Robert for using &#8220;hmmm&#8221;&#8211;is proper English only important when the slang term is used in the context of correcting YOUR mistake? </p>
<p>Or was it not a mistake at all&#8211;was it a deliberate tactic? A &#8220;proabort&#8221; tactic? (If I put the slang term in quotations, *then* is it okay to use slang?) You need to quit nit-picking and address the serious point made in contradiction of your assertion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/salk-institute-grows-human-brain-cells-in-rats/comment-page-1/#comment-4731</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 07:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=310#comment-4731</guid>
		<description>Please, people. Let&#039;s at least use proper English. &quot;Proabort&quot; is not a noun. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, people. Let&#8217;s at least use proper English. &#8220;Proabort&#8221; is not a noun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Up to Pro-Life shenangians</title>
		<link>http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/salk-institute-grows-human-brain-cells-in-rats/comment-page-1/#comment-4615</link>
		<dc:creator>Up to Pro-Life shenangians</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 02:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=310#comment-4615</guid>
		<description>If they&#039;re not life, what the heck are they using them for?

Zombie research?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they&#8217;re not life, what the heck are they using them for?</p>
<p>Zombie research?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/salk-institute-grows-human-brain-cells-in-rats/comment-page-1/#comment-4602</link>
		<dc:creator>Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=310#comment-4602</guid>
		<description>Phil says:   &quot;yet as I recall, stem-cells are not life, at least not yet they&#039;re not.&quot;

I don&#039;t know what source you&#039;re &quot;recalling&quot; this from, Phil, but it is no more scientific than vodooism.   All life is a part of a continuum, there is no known occurance of life springing from dead matter.

My guess is that you are using the typical proabort tactic of trying to confuse the different definitions of the word &quot;life&quot;....... one of which is the &quot;social part&quot; of our existence, from birth to death.   That sense of the word has absolutely nothing to do with the biological sense of the word, and yet you and other baby-killing proaborts always do your best to confuse the two definitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil says:   &#8220;yet as I recall, stem-cells are not life, at least not yet they&#8217;re not.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what source you&#8217;re &#8220;recalling&#8221; this from, Phil, but it is no more scientific than vodooism.   All life is a part of a continuum, there is no known occurance of life springing from dead matter.</p>
<p>My guess is that you are using the typical proabort tactic of trying to confuse the different definitions of the word &#8220;life&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;. one of which is the &#8220;social part&#8221; of our existence, from birth to death.   That sense of the word has absolutely nothing to do with the biological sense of the word, and yet you and other baby-killing proaborts always do your best to confuse the two definitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/salk-institute-grows-human-brain-cells-in-rats/comment-page-1/#comment-4591</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=310#comment-4591</guid>
		<description>Phil says: **Yet as I recall, stem-cells are not life, at least not yet they&#8217;re not.** 




Hmmm what is it if not ALIVE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil says: **Yet as I recall, stem-cells are not life, at least not yet they&rsquo;re not.** </p>
<p>Hmmm what is it if not ALIVE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/salk-institute-grows-human-brain-cells-in-rats/comment-page-1/#comment-4559</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=310#comment-4559</guid>
		<description>Whatever happened to the doctrine of &quot;life begins at conception&quot;? This has been the battle cry of the &quot;pro-life&quot; movement for ages. Yet as I recall, stem-cells are not life, at least not yet they&#039;re not. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever happened to the doctrine of &#8220;life begins at conception&#8221;? This has been the battle cry of the &#8220;pro-life&#8221; movement for ages. Yet as I recall, stem-cells are not life, at least not yet they&#8217;re not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

