Glad to hear this!

Take them to court anyway. The objective during that time was obviosuly to silence the prolife voice. This is illegal.

The fact that they have repented does not take away the fact that your voice WAS silenced. The admission that these illegal acts of harrasement were done in cooperation with Tiller and in actual response to him brings him into the lawsuit as well.

Anytime spenyt away from baby killing is good. Any money spent to defend baby killing is a good waste of their resources.

The police will learn to not do it. And Tiller needs to have it cost him to kill.

Take all parties to court for consiracy to defraud you of your Consittuional right of free speach.

This will also set an example for others who are abused by this godless baby killing system.

No, of course Maria von Trapp was not present literally; her name is associated, in my mind, with someone caring for children and helping them escape from a holocaust (this much is historically accurate, as anyone will know who has read her story), so I used it in a typical (i.e., as a type) of sidewalk counselors, to illustrate a point. You may have missed a good movie (If you haven’t seen “The Sound of Music”, do so; some artistic license is taken with the actual story, but the essence of it is true), an even better book, and a literary device. (It’s difficult for me to imagine anyone acquainted with Maria’s bio, if only the movie version, to miss the connection: What actually occurred in Wichita was tantamount to arresting Maria (after her conversion to Christ)or any other good, peaceful person(s) engaged in and known for praiseworthy work, especially towards intended holocaust victims.

Clear enough?!

slan,

Other than a few spelling difficulties,
(it’s, not “it’’s”; obviously, not “obviosuly”:
harassment, not “harrasement”; conspiracy, not “consiracy”; constitutional, not “Consittuional”, for future reference!)
your post is RIGHT ON! Thanks for pointing all this out for everyone concerned. . .