Hialeah, FL — Police in Hialeah, Florida, have closed an abortion clinic after discovery of a dead 22-week old baby that a tipster said was born alive and killed by clinic staff. Police are conducting a homicide investigation while an autopsy is being performed on the infant’s body.
Operation Rescue will call for all clinic personnel, including abortionist Frantz Bazile, owners Belkis Gonzalez and Siomara Senises, to be prosecuted under the Federal Born Alive Infants Protection Act if the autopsy indicates the baby was alive at birth.
Police have told reporters that an 18-year old girl who was 22 weeks pregnant went to A Gynecologists Diagnostic Center in the Miami suburb of Hialeah for an abortion and returned the following day in severe pain. She was informed that no doctor was present and was taken to a recovery area, where she delivered her premature baby. The baby was then taken from her and killed, according to the police informant, believed to be a clinic worker.
Police eventually discovered the baby’s body while executing a search warrant.
This is the second reported incident in recent months of an infant born alive at a Florida abortion mill. In April, 2005, a woman named Angele gave birth to Baby Rowan at Orlando Women’s Center operated by James Pendergraft. Angel’s cries for help for her baby were ignored and Rowan died.
This is not A Gynecologists Diagnostic Center’s first run-in with the law. A sister abortion clinic in Miramar, Florida, was closed last year after it was discovered that their abortionist had no medical license.
“We must demand that Florida authorities uphold the law,” said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman. “Women and babies are continuously endangered at what can only be described as dangerous human ‘chop chops.’ That is why we are calling for Federal prosecution under the Born Alive Infants Protection Act.”
“We, as a nation, need to come out of denial and face the true state of crisis that exists at the nation’s abortion mills,” said Newman. “The facts are that shoddy conditions and shoddier abortionists are the rule and not the exception. The only way to prevent horrific tragedies like this is to ban abortion in our country, and help women get connected to the resources and support that is amply available to them in our communities.”
Nobody’s gonna care. They’re too busy jumping all over Mel Gibson.
Now, if Mel had just killed somebody, he’d not be in so much trouble….
Of course we all want to see that these baby butchers get prosecuted for murder. They say, “if you shhot for the moon you may fall amongst the stars”, but what few realize is that the moon is one of the closest stars.
———————————————————————–
These abortionists are not being reported for there smaller, yet still significant infractures and so prosecuters and state regulators are less likely to investigate when they find no priors.
——————————————————————
In 2005 I studied and learned how to file complaints on abortionists, yet I don’t know of anyone who is willing to file these type of complaints, such as seeing that they update their physician profilinf with these infractions as required by law.
—————————————————————–
I have malpractice suits files on several abortionists that are not yet filed, nor is there anyone else in Florida that cares to do this.
—————————————————————–
In February of 2005 I filed a complaint on this Hialeah abortionist, Frantz Bazile. He had been disciplined in Illinois and according to Florida Law he was required to notify the state of Florida, but he never did. No reporting out of state actions is a serious charge that most medical boards frown on.
———————————————————
Unfortunately since it’s not fashionable for pro-lifers to report abortionists in this manner the statue of limitations ran out by the time I got started into this.
———————————————————————–
Frantz Bazile M.D., Abortionist at “A GYN. OF HIALEAH, INC”. where 51/2 month”baby was found dead”.
Florida Physician’s License #ME49347 Original Issue Date 10/30/1986
DOB: 04/19/1947
————————————————
Below is a Disciplinary Order on Bazile from Illinois which was never revealed to Florida as by law:
Description: Gross negligence and unprofessional conduct.
Start Date Discipline PROBATION 08/12/1991 End Date 08/12/1994
—————————————-
State of Illiinois-Dept of Professional Regulation-Complaintant
VERSUS
Frantz Bazile, M.D. State of Illinois License NO. 036-058418,
1. Frantz is presently the holder of a Certificate of Registration as a Physician and Surgeon in the State of Illinois, License No. 036-058418, is issued by the Department of Professional Regulation of the State of Illinois. Said license is presently in active status and was in active status at all times relevant to this complaint.
————————–
2. On September 26, 1987, Patient A, seventeen (17) years of age, was in the late second trimester of a pregnancy.
———————————————————————————–
3. On September 26, 1987, Respondent attempted to perform an abortion procedure on Patient A at the Paulina Surgi-Center, Inc. located at 7616 North Paulina Avenue, Chicago, Illinois.
——————————————————————————–
4. Respondent, in attempting to perform the abortion procedure, removed spongy material from Patient A.
———————————————————————————
5. Following the removal of spongy material by the Respondent, Patient A began to bleed profusely from the uterine and/or vaginal area.
————————————————————————————————–
6. Subsequent to the aforementioned bleeding, Respondent administered Ergotrate and placed a vaginal vein suture.
———————————————–
7. On September 26, 1987, subsequent to the attempted abortion procedure performed on patient A by Respondent, Patient A was transferred by ambulance from the Paulina Surgi-Center, Inc., to St. Francis Hospital in Evanston, Illinois.
——————————————
8. On September 26, 1987, Patient A underwent an emergency Cesarean Section and a live infant was delivered at St. Francis Hospital in Evanston, Illinois.
———————————————–
9. On September 26, 1987, the aforementioned infant died.
———————————————–
10. Before, during and after the attempted abortion procedure, various acts and ommissions occured, including, but not limited to the folllowing;
a. Respondent failed to accurately assess Patient A’s gestational age and physical condition prior to attempting to perform an abortion procedure;
b. Respondent failed to perform an ultrasound on Patient A;
c. Respondent failed to recognize that the spongy material which he removed from Patient A during the attempted abortion procedure was mature placental tissue;
d. Respondent performed the attempted abortion procedure in such a manner as to cause a laceration of the vagina;
e. Respondent performed the attempted abortion procedure in such a manner as to cause a laceration of the cervix;
f. Respondent performed the attempted abortion in such a manner as to cause Patient A to bleed profusely; and;
g. Respondent failed to appropriately assess Patient A when Patient A started bleeding.
——————————————-
As a direct and proximate result of one or more of the above stated ats and/or omissions of the Respondent, Patient A was injured in that she sustained a loss of blood, requoiring blood transfusions; sustained a vaginal laceration; sustained a cervical laceration; was required to undergo an emergency Cesarean Section; and suffered physical pain and emotional distress. The acts and/or omissions of the Respondent, as set forth above, are evidence of recklessness or cvarelessness toward or a disregard for the safety or well-being of Patient A resulted in injury to Patient A.
————————————
Respondent’s conduct, as set forth above, constitutes gross negligence, in violation of the medical Practice Act of 1987, Illinois Revised Statutes (1987), Chapter 111, paragraph 4400-22(A) (4).
————————————————————————————
14. The foregoing acts and/or omissions are grounds for revocation or suspension of a Certificate of Registration pursuant to Illinois Revised Statutes, (1987), Chapter 111, paragraph(s) 4400-22 (A) (4)
———————————————–
WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing allegations, the DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION of the State of Illinois, by Richard P Ryan, its Chief of Medical Prosecutions, prays that the Physician and Surgeon of Frantz Bazile be suspended, revoked, or otherwise disciplined.
Frantz Bazile M.D., Abortionist at “A GYN. OF HIALEAH, INC”. where 5-1/2 week “baby was found dead”.
Florida Physician’s License #ME49347 Original Issue Date 10/30/1986
DOB: 04/19/1947
————————————————
Below is a Disciplinary Order on Bazile from Illinois which was never revealed to Florida as by law:
Description: Gross negligence and unprofessional conduct.
Start Date Discipline PROBATION 08/12/1991 End Date 08/12/1994
—————————————-
State of Illiinois-Dept of Professional Regulation-Complaintant
VERSUS
Frantz Bazile, M.D. State of Illinois License NO. 036-058418,
————————————————————————
1. Frantz is presently the holder of a Certificate of Registration as a Physician and Surgeon in the State of Illinois, License No. 036-058418, is issued by the Department of Professional Regulation of the State of Illinois. Said license is presently in active status and was in active status at all times relevant to this complaint.
————————————————————————
2. On September 26, 1987, Patient A, seventeen (17) years of age, was in the late second trimester of a pregnancy.
———————————————————————–
3. On September 26, 1987, Respondent attempted to perform an abortion procedure on Patient A at the Paulina Surgi-Center, Inc. located at 7616 North Paulina Avenue, Chicago, Illinois.
———————————————————————
4. Respondent, in attempting to perform the abortion procedure, removed spongy material from Patient A.
———————————————————————————
5. Following the removal of spongy material by the Respondent, Patient A began to bleed profusely from the uterine and/or vaginal area.
————————————————————————————————–
6. Subsequent to the aforementioned bleeding, Respondent administered Ergotrate and placed a vaginal vein suture.
———————————————–
7. On September 26, 1987, subsequent to the attempted abortion procedure performed on patient A by Respondent, Patient A was transferred by ambulance from the Paulina Surgi-Center, Inc., to St. Francis Hospital in Evanston, Illinois.
——————————————
8. On September 26, 1987, Patient A underwent an emergency Cesarean Section and a live infant was delivered at St. Francis Hospital in Evanston, Illinois.
———————————————–
9. On September 26, 1987, the aforementioned infant died.
———————————————–
10. Before, during and after the attempted abortion procedure, various acts and omissions occurred, including, but not limited to the following;
a. Respondent failed to accurately assess Patient A’s gestational age and physical condition prior to attempting to perform an abortion procedure;
b. Respondent failed to perform an ultrasound on Patient A;
c. Respondent failed to recognize that the spongy material which he removed from Patient A during the attempted abortion procedure was mature placental tissue;
d. Respondent performed the attempted abortion procedure in such a manner as to cause a laceration of the vagina;
e. Respondent performed the attempted abortion procedure in such a manner as to cause a laceration of the cervix;
f. Respondent performed the attempted abortion in such a manner as to cause Patient A to bleed profusely; and;
g. Respondent failed to appropriately assess Patient A when Patient A started bleeding.
——————————————-
As a direct and proximate result of one or more of the above stated acts and/or omissions of the Respondent, Patient A was injured in that she sustained a loss of blood, requiring blood transfusions; sustained a vaginal laceration; sustained a cervical laceration; was required to undergo an emergency Cesarean Section; and suffered physical pain and emotional distress. The acts and/or omissions of the Respondent, as set forth above, are evidence of recklessness or carelessness toward or a disregard for the safety or well-being of Patient A resulted in injury to Patient A.
————————————
Respondent’s conduct, as set forth above, constitutes gross negligence, in violation of the medical Practice Act of 1987, Illinois Revised Statutes (1987), Chapter 111, paragraph 4400-22(A) (4).
————————————————————————
14. The foregoing acts and/or omissions are grounds for revocation or suspension of a Certificate of Registration pursuant to Illinois Revised Statutes, (1987), Chapter 111, paragraph(s) 4400-22 (A) (4)
———————————————–
WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing allegations, the DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION of the State of Illinois, by Richard P Ryan, its Chief of Medical Prosecutions, prays that the Physician and Surgeon of Frantz Bazile be suspended, revoked, or otherwise disciplined.
Let’s read into some of the statements being made by the Miami Herald thus far.
Meanwhile, Hialeah police and the State Attorney’s office say the investigation into the potential murder at the clinic continues…………
” An autopsy has been performed on the fetus, but the results have not yet been made public.”
“We are awaiting test results. Once they are back, they will be making a decision on what charges will be filed, if any.”
The autopsy has been performed? We are awaiting test results?
An autopsy has begun would be a better statement. An autopsy is an examination of a cadaver. If you don’t have the results back then you can’t really say an autopsy has been performed.
The reporter is saying the autopsy has been performed, not quoting someone else.
The reporter quotes: “Hialeah police and the State Attorney’s office say”… “We are awaiting test results”.
REBECCA DELLAGLORIA, Herald “investigative” reporter can’t seem to tell us what person in the Hialeah Police, or even the state’s attorney’s name that she is quoting.
So all this does is confuse everybody and the defenders of the baby are buying into it. Lie to everybody else, but for God’s sake don’t lie to yourself. The problem with concerned citizens is they buy everybody else’s story but they don’t really buy their own or the belief that this little girl is actually a person who needs to be protected and wasn’t.
If you go into a restaurant and the waitress says, “What’ll
you have?” And you say, “Whatever”. That waitress will bring you “Whatever”.
Our expectations about ourselves and our outcome in life most often come from those around us, our refer-ence group.
The baby was alive and there is enough evidence to support this from witnesses who were at the scene. The baby is suppose to be wisked off to the hospital. Belkis Gonzalez holds no medical license. The baby was supposed to be treated as a human. The police are not treating this as a human baby as Federal law clearly defines that they do so.
Child protective services should have made an arrest by now! This a situation that should involve Health & Human services, what does anybody in the city of Hialeah have to do with this?
The only concern the city of Hialeah has is that they can collect occupational license taxes on Senises 3 miles away at the second clinic operating now.
Health & Human services, a federal agency, has sent memos out to child protective services reminding them of the importance of “the Born Alive Infants Protection Act” and yet nobody has heard any statement by this government agency or are they demanding it.
Do you think we should rely on a state’s attorney who consults with AHCA, the same agency that can’t police these morons? Your success or failure comes from the attitude, behavior, and beliefs of your refer-ence group.
People who continue to consult with the medical examiner, State’s Attorney, AHCA, or Hialeah police will find themselves attracting very low expectations.
BAIPA: Born- Alive Infants Protection Act:
EMTALA: Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act
DHHS: Department of Health and Human Services: 1-877-696-6775
Simply call the United States Department of Health & Human Services and ask them who is doing the investigation on the “Baby Born-Alive Infants Protection Act”.
If they say anything about state or local authorities, ask them again and again, who in the DHHS-Department of Health & Human Services is doing the investigation on the “Baby Born Alive”, the one that was not protected in the Hialeah abortion clinic?
“April 2005, the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) brought life to the BAIPA, announcing: “As a matter of law and policy, [DHHS] will investigate all circumstances where individuals and entities are reported to be withholding medical care from an infant born alive in potential violation of federal statutes.” ~Mike Leavitt, Secretary of US Health & Human Services.
“Under the BAIPA, the DHHS interprets EMTALA to protect all “born-alive” infants; hospitals and physicians violating regulatory requirements face agency-sanctioned monetary penalties or a “private right of action by any individual harmed as a direct result.”
“According to its memorandum, the DHHS will investigate allegations of EMTALA violations whenever it finds evidence that a newborn was not provided with at least a medical screening examination under circumstances in which a “prudent layperson observer” could conclude from the infant’s “appearance or behavior” that it was “suffering from an emergency medical condition.”
Add to this legislation and decrees by the Neonatal Resuscitation, Program (NRP), the US Department of
Health and Human Services (DHHS), the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), and the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA), an ethical and legal quandary develops (Sayeed, 2005).
The US Supreme Court has stated that “courts must presume that a legislature says in a statute what it means and means in a statute what it says there”; thus, judges interpret law by analyzing “concrete statutory language, not by reference to abstract notions of generalized legislative intent.”
The BAIPA indiscriminately defines “born alive” to include an infant “at any stage of development… regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion,” and it makes no reference to standards of care or best interests, nor does it specifically protect a parent’s decision-making authority.
Under the law’s strict logic, an 18-week miscarried fetus with a detectable heart beat after delivery is entitled to the full protections of the law as determined by “any Act of Congress, or any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies.”
Does anybody know why have these Hialeah “pro-life” representatives have not made any statements to the press or spoken tho the United States Department of Health & Human Services? Hialeah is their district.
Rudy Garcia
7475 West Fourth Ave.
Hialeah, FL
33014-4327
305.364.3191
Carlos Lopez Canterra
2300 Coral Way
Suite 111
Miami, FL 33145
305.442.6877