Wichita, KS — Operation Rescue has obtained documents showing ties between the principles involved in the Tiller criminal case dismissal through campaign contributions.
THE PLAYERS:
Abortionist George R. Tiller: Tiller is an abortionist specializing in late-term abortions in Wichita, Kansas. He was charged by former Attorney General Phill Kline with thirty criminal counts on December 21, 2006, for illegal late-term abortions and improper reporting of those abortions after a 3-year inquisition. Tiller is a heavy contributor to pro-abortion political candidates.
District Attorney Nola Tedesco Foulston: She is the Sedgwick County DA who intervened after charges were filed against Tiller. Foulston persuaded Judge Paul W. Clark to dismiss the Tiller charges on jurisdictional groundson December 22, 2006, then successfully defended her motion at a hearing before Clark on December 27. She continues to refuse to address or investigate the 30 charges and their evidence, having deferred to Kline’s replacement, Attorney General Paul Morrison.
Judge Paul W. Clark: Judge Clark dismissed the Tiller charges at Foulston’s request during an ex-parte hearing in December 22, 2006, of which former Attorney General Phill Kline had no notice, or representation during the hearing. Clark never read the criminal complaint or inspected the evidence. Clark conducted a second hearing on December 27 where he read his pre-written decision to keep the case dismissed, even though Asst. Attorney General Steve Maxwell pointed clearly to Kansas law during oral arguments that gave an Attorney General authority to file criminal cases in district courts.
Attorney Dan Monnat: Monnat is one of George Tiller’s attorneys. He spoke at the December 27, 2006 hearing before Judge Clark, fully joining in Foulston’s defense of the case dismissal.
Attorney General Paul Morrison: Morrison is an abortion supporter who switched to the Democratic Party to run against Kline. The centerpiece of his campaign was opposition to Kline’s investigation of abortion clinics. It has been previously reported that while Morrison received no direct campaign money from Tiller, he did benefit from hundreds of thousands of dollars in “hit piece” mailings against Kline by third-party organizations that have been traced directly to Tiller.
THE MONEY TRAIL:
Campaign finance records show a donation from Tiller’s wife, Jeanne, to Foulston during her first run for District Attorney in 1988. Foulston has run unopposed since 1992. Tiller family campaign contributions are frequently made in Jeanne’s name. (This document was missing from Foulston’s file at the Sedgwick County Election Office, and had to be obtained another way.)
Click here to read these documents.Campaign finance records indicate that both Foulston and Tiller attorney Dan Monnat donated to the campaign of Judge Paul W. Clark during his last election.
Click here to read these documents.Campaign finance records indicate that Foulston has a history of giving to Clark campaigns. (The donation listed here was made under Foulston’s maiden name, Nola Tedesco.)
Click here to read these documents.
“It is obvious from the documentation that the people involved with dismissing or not pursuing the Tiller criminal case all have political ties of some kind,” said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman. “There is a clear appearance of impropriety here that should be investigated. Paybacks for campaign favors should never be allowed to influence the prosecution of a criminal case. If that proves to be the situation here, it is something that needs to be exposed and dealt with so justice can move forward.”
Follow the money.
If this trail is really so clear, it should be easy for higher authorities, like the federal government, to intervene. Has there been any progress along those lines?
In the Kansas City Star’s shocking headline wherein Paul Morrison said he was switching to the democratic party, Morrison also stated in the innocuous small print that he was pro-choice. He had just come from visiting Kathleen Sebelius where he had learned fund raising 101, i.e., bury your sinister strategy from the general public by including it in a major announcment, knowing that it will reach the eyes, ears and pocketbooks of those it is intended for.
Reminds me of the Terri Schindler case. There was money contributed to the judge in that case from suspicious places and other things (I think Greer was somehow connected to the Hospice where Terri was murdered).
I just pray that the people of Kansas can wake up and smell the blood money!
http://operationrescue.org/photos/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=7816&g2_serialNumber
This graphic needs updating monkeys holding money bags, and perhaps the tail of George Tiller, their dominant primate?
In my opinion the only things that abortion did for this country were; It aided in allowing men/women to become irresponsible when it comes to use of any sexual protection. It made murder acceptable and legal. It turned doctors into paid murderers. It destroyed families. It destroyed morals. It made women feel that giving birth to children/motherhood was a cheap choice and not a gift. It sent the message that infanticide was okay too.It sends the message that people should be allowed to live as they wish and do as they please .It made sex/rape of minors acceptable.Abortion is really an abomination.It must be stopped.
4life, we finally agree on something.
Abortion’s advocacy of fornication has lead the government’s requiring:
School Girls Ordered Fornication Vaccine
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/02/02/D8N1PVG80.html
http://www.roanoke.com/politics%5Cwb/101766
http://www.roanoke.com/politics/wb/101436
4life, we finally agree on something.
Abortion’s advocacy of fornication has lead the government’s requiring:
School Girls Ordered Fornication Vaccine
Texas Governor Orders Schoolgirls Vaccinated With Fornication Vaccine
Drug Company Buys Governor’s Support in Billion Dollar Deal
Liz Austin Peterson / The Associated Press
AUSTIN — Bypassing the Texas Legislature, Republican Gov. Rick Perry ordered Friday that schoolgirls as young as 11 and 12 must be vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer, making Texas the first state to require the shots. The girls will have to get Merck pharmaceuticals new vaccine against strains of the human papillomavirus, or HPV, that are responsible for most cases of cervical cancer. Merck is bankrolling efforts to pass laws in state legislatures across the country mandating it Gardasil vaccine. It doubled its lobbying budget in Texas and has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country. Perry has several ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company’s three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, his former chief of staff. His current chief of staff’s mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government. Full story…
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/02/02/D8N1PVG80.html
They just passed this in Virginia as well.
Senate endorse bill to require girls to be vaccinated for HPV
The Virginian-Pilot
© February 2, 2007 |
RICHMOND — State senators today endorsed a bill that would require middle school girls to be vaccinated against the human papillomavirus that causes cervical cancer.
Sponsored by Sen. Janet Howell, D-Fairfax, SB1230 would require the vaccine be administered before girls’ entry into the sixth grade.
A similar bill, HB2035, spearheaded by Del. Phillip Hamilton, R-Newport News, was heard for the first time on the House floor Friday.
http://www.roanoke.com/politics%5Cwb/101766
http://www.roanoke.com/politics/wb/101436
I am not sure I understand why some of the pro-life people are concerned over the HPV vaccine. No matter how well we try to raise our kids, we *cannot* ultimately control what they do sexually. Nor can anyone control what is done to them by a perpetrator, sadly. Many girls are indeed infected by rape, which is why ER ‘rape kits’ test for STD’s.
Regardless of someone’s behavior, we all lose if a girl gets cancer. My understanding is, at least in Texas, a parent can refuse the vaccine on religious grounds, like they can refuse any other vaccine.
The way the law was passed was very unusual, likely political, and should be investigated. It should have gone through regular legal channels. But I do not see what the vaccine has to do with ‘aboriton’s advocacy of fornication.’
Steven,
Its a matter of consequences.
If parents give children booze at home because they believe it is “safer” than having them drink elsewhere- they promote drunkeness.
If parents advocate for condom usuage because it is “safer” sex, they advocate for fornication.
If we allow the government to FORCE our children “protection” from the consequences of sin, we advocate for less then perfection, they are more apt to sin if the threat of some consequences are removed or limited. God does not encourage sin, neither should we.
God does not remove the consequnces of sin. Nor does He sell ‘endulgences’ as some religions might.
God is a loving parent who teaches His child in the way in which to go- warns His child of the consequences of going off path and allows the just consequences as His mercy is shown in His justice. The loving Father’s example is there for us to learn by. Some refuse to be taught, both children and adults.
I’m more concerned with the government dictating vaccinations of any kind. What could be the harm done in the long term by this vaccine? Do we have any assurances? How many are old enough to remember the swine flu fiasco and the people disabled and killed by Guillan-Barre Syndrome, which resulted from this vaccine? I’ve never gotten a flu vaccine in my life and never will. I don’t trust any of them.
If you don’t want your kids to get the vaccine, don’t give your kids the vaccine. But when your daughter gets cervical cancer, what will you do then?
The death industry has become the new untouchables. They can break laws at will without fear of accountability. The corrupt dealings of the Tiller case remind me of the Terri Schiavo case and the massive judicial fraud involved.
Isaiah 59:15-20 tells us that when there is no justice God’s “arm” works out salvation and administers justice. Compare the reference to the helmet of salvation in verse 17 to Ephesians 6:10-18 and we have a call to spiritual warfare. Spiritual warfare against the powers of darkness brings salvation and judgment.
Speaking of judgment, Kansas is ripe for judgment for her coverups of murders and child rapes. While I do not claim to be a prophet, I am convinced that judgment is coming to Kansas. The weather forecast this summer: record tornadoes ripping through Kansas.
Mary
With any intervention, the risks must be weighed against benefit. Vaccines represent perhaps the most important public health measure in the last 30 years. Thousands of Americans die from the flu each year, particularly the vulnerable (chronically ill, elderly, young). But many people get the flu and do not die. That is why the CDC highly recommends the flu vaccine for certain individuals, not the entire population.
The only ‘assurance’ we really have is the reality that Christ is risen, and that he is going to come back.
Everything else is a decision we have to make. I would not overly trust any vaccine, but I would not trust the diseases either. America is a very cosmopolitan place, with people coming and going, and kids who are not vaccinated are put in jeopardy by their parents.
Speaking of the flu shot,what the heck is in that thing?? I refuse to take it. Every time I do I become deathly ill!!!
4life, Do you have a compromised immune system in some way due to age, general health, or a particular medical treatment? The vaccine contains a weakened form of live virus. The idea is that your immune system can cut its teeth on the weakened form of the virus, and know how to fight the stronger form when it appears. Since the weakened virus is still “alive” in the vaccine, its possible your body is over-reacting to the immunization. Unless you fall into an at-risk group of some kind, you shouldn’t be taking the flu vaccine anyway.
Dear unreal,I am currently pregnant so my OB told me she thought it would be a good idea. I protested because in the past I have always become ill after taking the shot. She kept on insisting that she wanted me to take it. I caved, and the very next day I fell ill. I ended up on antibiotics due to a respiratory infection. I couldn’t say it was due to the shot,but it is questionable considering past experiences.
A light hearted note to all this flu discussion. I had a severe bout several years ago and after suffering miserably for 2 weeks, discovered I had only lost 6 pounds. I expected 10 minimum. Needless to say I was irate. Fortunately I haven’t been sick since then, and will comment no further on my weight.
Mary asks: “What could be the harm done in the long term by this vaccine? Do we have any assurances?” No Mary there no assurances in fat there are risks with this vaccine that are not associated with others given to school kids-
The list of concerns also included a lack of information on how parents can choose to not have their daughters vaccinated; how to pay the $360-per-patient cost; and whether it’s a good idea to require a drug that was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration less than a year ago.
“We’re talking about our children. They should not be guinea pigs of the state,” said Angela Griffiths, executive director of Await & Find, an East Bay nonprofit
She pointed out that other required vaccinations that are part of the required shots for school-age children were on the market for an average of 14 years before they became mandatory. Vaccine-related adverse experiences that were observed in clinical trials among recipients of GARDASIL were pain (83.9 percent), swelling (25.4 percent), erythema (24.6 percent), fever (10.3 percent), nausea (4.2 percent), pruritis (3.1 percent) and dizziness (2.8 percent). GARDASIL is contraindicated in individuals who are hypersensitive to the active substances or to any of the excipients of the vaccine.
A point of concern is that the manufacturer, Merck & Co., is the manufacturer of the only vaccine to be approved by the FDA. Vaccination with GARDASIL may not result in protection in all vaccine recipients.
The price is $120 per dose, and it is administered in three doses over a six-month period. GARDASIL should be administered in three separate intramuscular injections in the upper arm or upper thigh over a six-month period. The following dosage schedule is recommended: first dose at elected date, second dose two months after the first dose and the third dose six months after the first dose. Who pays the $360-per-patient required cost Assemblyman Alan Nakanishi, said it would be dangerous for the state to mandate the use of a vaccine that was approved by the FDA just last June. Not even one year-
“For many drugs, side effects don’t show up until much later,” he added.
Confirmed: Your Daughter Is Merck’s Guinea Pig
Devvy Kidd / NewsWithViews.com
My February 8, 2007 column resulted in quite a few radio show invitations. During my appearance on Michael Baisden’s show, several doctors called in to say the HPV vaccine was safe, it has been tested, and yes, they would get their daughters shot up. One mother who phoned into the show said her daughter has received the first of the three shot series and is now worried and doesn’t know what to do. I could give her no advice because I’m not a physician, but she should be worried. On March 15, 2007, the bomb dropped on a cable network show which quickly made the Internet media; see full important column here. Diane M. Harper, a researcher who worked on this vaccine has revealed that it has NOT been tested on young girls and “worst case” scenario: increased cervical cancer rates. Full story… http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd256.htm Top Researcher: ‘Untested’ Vaccine Could Harm
WorldNetDaily.com
A researcher who worked on a vaccine for the human papillomavirus is warning that it hasn’t been tested on young girls, is “silly” for states to mandate the vaccination, and in a worst-case scenario could even increase cervical cancer rates. In a report published by the Indiana-based Daily News, researcher Diane M. Harper said giving such a vaccine to 11-year-olds “is a great big public health experiment.” Full story… http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54713