<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Bellevue Taxpayers Forced To Subsidize Carhart’s Abortion Business</title> <atom:link href="http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/bellevue-taxpayers-forced-to-subsidize-carhart%e2%80%99s-abortion-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/bellevue-taxpayers-forced-to-subsidize-carhart%e2%80%99s-abortion-business/</link> <description>Operation Rescue® is one of the leading pro-life Christian activist organizations in the nation and has become the voice of the pro-life activist movement in America. Its activities are on the cutting edge of the abortion issue, taking direct action to restore legal personhood to the pre-born and stop abortion in obedience to biblical mandates.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:13:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Sarah</title><link>http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/bellevue-taxpayers-forced-to-subsidize-carhart%e2%80%99s-abortion-business/comment-page-1/#comment-309269</link> <dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:38:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=5239#comment-309269</guid> <description>Thats fine. Leave the cameras up at Carharts mill...but while taxpayers are at it, install some in his &quot;procedure&quot; rooms to make sure he is following the law! Is he CLEAN? Is he aborting past the limit of the law? Is he molesting patients (hey its happened inside some mills ya know!)?  Turn the cameras on him too!Truly, in the end, those cameras will testify to the peacefulness of pro-lifers and may protect them from pro-abort violence.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats fine. Leave the cameras up at Carharts mill&#8230;but while taxpayers are at it, install some in his &#8220;procedure&#8221; rooms to make sure he is following the law! Is he CLEAN? Is he aborting past the limit of the law? Is he molesting patients (hey its happened inside some mills ya know!)?  Turn the cameras on him too!</p><p>Truly, in the end, those cameras will testify to the peacefulness of pro-lifers and may protect them from pro-abort violence.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alayna Staggers, "Mothers Against Abortion"</title><link>http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/bellevue-taxpayers-forced-to-subsidize-carhart%e2%80%99s-abortion-business/comment-page-1/#comment-309246</link> <dc:creator>Alayna Staggers, "Mothers Against Abortion"</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:45:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=5239#comment-309246</guid> <description>The city of Heath, Ohio put up cameras at the intersections to catch speeders and collect fines.  The public did not know or approve of the cameras and had a vote taken on keeping or taking the cameras down November 3, 2009.  The citizen&#039;s vote against the cameras took priority, so the cameras are down.  The main objection was too much government involvement in our lives without permission.
Forcing Bellevue Taxpayers to foot the bill to monitor activities at Carhart&#039;s clinic sounds like a legal issue to me.  I may be wrong, but if the city of Heath was forced to remove cameras due to citizen objection, should the citizens of Bellevue have a say in the matter?
Maybe a petition is in order.  We were lucky to have the voting session come up so it was on the ballot.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The city of Heath, Ohio put up cameras at the intersections to catch speeders and collect fines.  The public did not know or approve of the cameras and had a vote taken on keeping or taking the cameras down November 3, 2009.  The citizen&#8217;s vote against the cameras took priority, so the cameras are down.  The main objection was too much government involvement in our lives without permission.<br
/> Forcing Bellevue Taxpayers to foot the bill to monitor activities at Carhart&#8217;s clinic sounds like a legal issue to me.  I may be wrong, but if the city of Heath was forced to remove cameras due to citizen objection, should the citizens of Bellevue have a say in the matter?<br
/> Maybe a petition is in order.  We were lucky to have the voting session come up so it was on the ballot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/18 queries in 0.061 seconds using disk

Served from: server.operationrescue.org @ 2010-03-11 21:34:57 -->