I also find it quite offensive that you dismiss concerns about the souls of sinners. You call that a “what if.” For God, every soul is precious. God the Father allowed His Son to suffer and die so that we have the opportunity (but not an automatic guarantee) to spend eternity in Heaven. We must hope that those who are committing serious sin live as long as possible so they have every opportunity to convert and repent here on earth. Conversion must happen in this life. It would be horrible if they were prevented from having every chance that God planned to make available to them.

The babies are secondary to the devil’s reason for pushing abortion. Rather, one single abortion can snare so many souls for the devil. The devil wants to prevent as many souls as possible from spending eternity with God. The soul of the mother and anyone coerces her into an abortion or supports her decision is in jeopardy. Obviously the souls of anyone who promote abortion are in jeopardy. This is a battle with the devil himself. Making oneself available to be used by Christ to bring about a conversion is what is needed. Bringing a soul away from the devil’s clutches is a victory for Christ. Conversion does not come by force or violence. If one dies in a state of mortal sin, it is a victory for the devil.

You tell me I do not answer certain things yet you fail to answer the Gospel according to St. Matthew 26:52.

You seem to be focused on the Old Testament. I prefer to listen to what God Himself has said. You cannot answer my questions about St. Paul or Bernard Nathanson and dismiss them as “what ifs.” In either case, God would have most definitely lost that soul and humanity would have lost valuable information.

I condemn all violence whether it is from pro-aborts (who commit most of the violence) or so-called “prolife” people. As our Lord and Savior states, those who live by the sword will die by th sword. Despite your repeated accusations of my being discriminatory, I do not discriminate. I never said there was a difference between a born person and an unborn person. Life begins at conception. Period.

Violence only breeds more violence. The point of being prolife is to respect ALL human life, not just some. We are to allow the Author of Life, God Himself, the determination of the beginning and end of life. Pro-aborts are the ones who pick and choose which life to respect. They are also the ones who refuse to acknowledge the rightful place of God to number our days.

I have brought up various Scriptures directly quoting our Lord. You have ignored them and brought up Scriptures that do not directly quote our Lord. Again, I will say that if the statements by our Lord were not for us to obey, they would not have been written. The Gospels could have gone from the return from Egypt directly to the Passion if the Words of Jesus were somehow not relevant. The fact of the matter is that they ARE written in the Gospel.

You may disagree with the Catholic Church but that is between you and God. I will admit and apologize for the nickname comment. The point of the matter is that a personal interpretation of the Bible by someone online is not going to change anything. In fact, I have heard that same claim by a pro-abort who sometimes heckles me on the sidewalk in front of the local child sacrifice mill. He believes the Commandment has the same wording as you do. He also believes the pre-born are not human and thus abortion does not violate that Commandment. Wording it that way allows a pro-abort to ease their conscience. On the other hand, Thou shalt not kill does not provide such a loophole for a pro-abort.

Any act of violence does nothing to save babies. Abortion customers will go to another abortionist. Pro-aborts get the opportunity to demonize true prolifers (the ones who are not violent) and attempt keep them off the sidewalk. Ultimately, violence will only result in fewer saved babies because fewer prolifers will have the opportunity to peacefully and legally witness for life and change hearts and minds. New prolifers will choose not to go to the sidewalks. Violence begets more violence. It is not the answer. Period.

Me either.

But are we to discriminate against the preborn like a bunch of proaborts- claiming they must be born before they are worthy of a defense that might take the life of their killers?

How old does a child need to be in order to be worthy of equal defense?

“What ifs” and desire to be content to being ignorant of scripture because of an on line name? Is that the best response you have to study to show YOURSELF aprroved unto God?

No one has asked that you accept the words of man, except the Catholc Church where I seldom see an actual Bible Study. What IS expected is that you seek the truth for yoruself. Search scripture and see if defense is a part of the character of God. See if what is said about the word that GOD chose in the 6th commandment is best interpretted murder or kill as the Catholic church has aledgedly taught you.

You should know, if you studied scripture that the word in the 6th commandment, for “murder” is ratsach and is NEVER used to describe a defensive killing, a self defense killing, a killing of war, or the execution of someone who has shed innocent blood.

You expect that I should answer questions regarding laws that are binding to Jews when I am not Jewish- (BTW there are 613 such laws if you study the scriptures)yet you ignore inquiries about Moses and why God does not claim his defensive killing to be murder.

You refuse to address any substantial differences between flight 91 killings by defenders of self and nation, Phinehas, Ehud, Moses and other modern day defenders like Bonehoffer, Niemöller, Bray, Shannon, or Hill.

How old does a person need to be in order to be worthy of equal defense?

Reagrding the laws of God that we are to adher to as Christians. Have you kept the Noahide laws? How about the ten commandments? And which do you adher or fail to adher to? The original ten or the recap of the original ten found 600 years later and taught by the Catholic church? I do not know of anyone who has? But perhaps you are better than all of those?

The fact is that in order to proclaim God’s teachings on subjects, one does not need ot be perfect or else it would never get done. No one is perfect when it comes to the law. The law does not save you.

Now you may not like this, Scripture says that the only way for a land to be cleansed of the blood guilt on it, is for the blood of the one who sheds innocent blood to be shed. and I want God’s blessing to come to this nation. This can be done by Christ’s precious blood, but if It is refused, this nation will suffer without God’s blessings. I wish for my grandchildren not to come under God’s wrath but instead His blessing so I advocate for the just execution of baby killers who will not stop killing.

Defending any human from an unjust agressor, born or unborn is not murder.

There is a reason that the NT contains statements from Jesus. We are to read and obey them. Otherwise, there would be little reason to quote Jesus in His public ministry. The NT could have just gone from the Nativity and early years direct to the Passion.

As to the statement about the commandment Thou shalt not kill, as a Catholic, I’ll take what the Catholic Church has to say about it over some poster whose nickname is that of an amphibian. The Catholic Church has existed since Pentecost.

I said nothing about your not being able to judge. Clearly it is expected that any Christian should judge the horrible sin of abortion to be wrong. If you read the Scripture about casting the first stone, you’ll know that quite literally, the woman was about to be stoned. Who is the one who is interpreting scripture for his own purposes?

As to your claims about Christ rebuking St. Peter, it is you who are interpreting. He said nothing about this applying only to Him. Read the Gospel according to St. Matthew, Chapter 26 verse 52. Please tell me where that verse says anything along the lines of how you are interpreting it.

As far as peaceful and prayerful pickets or just plain witnessing on the sidewalk near an abortion mill, that is what a lot of prolifers do. That is what I personally do. I don’t recall saying there was a problem with that. Your note erroneously implies that I did.

Again, what if someone had killed St. Paul back in the days when he was known as Saul? Afterall, Saul was killing Christians. I have asked you twice about this and you conveniently ignored it.

Then there is Bernard Nathanson, a former abortionist who went from being an athiest to a Catholic. He had a conversion which hopefully saved his soul and he has provided the pro-life movement with a great deal of information to refute the pro-abortion claims. Had he not had a chance to convert, he’d have been subject to immediate judgment. God wants all souls to ultimately be in Heaven but the conversion must take place in this life. It is God who numbers our days, not human beings. It is not for us to take that right away from God.