Archive for December, 2006

KS Media Disregards Evidence Against Tiller To Focus On Petty Politics

Ignored witness list indicates Kline has a compelling case against Tiller

By Cheryl Sullenger

Wichita, KS — While Attorney General Phill Kline continues to work to reinstate 30 criminal charges against abortionist George R. Tiller for illegal late-term abortions, the media has ignored and even misrepresented the seriousness and validity of the charges, and has instead turned the focus of the case to partisan political personality conflicts.

Playing Politics

“If anyone has politicized this case, it is the Kansas media and Attorney General-elect Paul Morrison,” said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman. “They are political enemies of Kline’s and cannot seem to put aside politics and look at the justice issues involved here.”

For days, headline stories have dealt with Morrison’s vow to terminate Special Prosecutor Don McKinney, who was appointed by Kline to pursue the case against Tiller.

“Morrison has already made the decision to fire Mr. McKinney even though he has never spoken to him nor has he even bothered to read the complaint,” said Newman. “This is the least professional behavior an Attorney General could engage in. It is no wonder that our sources tell us that there is a mass exodus from the AG’s office of people who simply cannot work with this man.”

“Morrison is playing politics by getting rid of an appointee of his political rival in order to protect a man who helped him win election by pumping huge amounts of money into the campaign against Kline. Tiller scratched Morrison’s back, now Morrison is covering Tiller’s to ensure he never has to face the music for his alleged crimes. Politics can’t get much more corrupt than that.”

Morrison claims that McKinney cannot do his job because he is a pro-life supporter.

“Why is it that Morrison can be a supporter of radical abortion rights, yet is not questioned about his ability to do his job in prosecuting an abortionist? The question is only raised if one is pro-life. That double standard is completely unfair. People can hold personal convictions and still act professionally. Apparently that is a concept that Morrison is unfamiliar with in thought and action.”

Probable Cause

Completely forgotten in the entire affair is the evidence that Kline has presented to support the 30 charges having to do with the commission of illegal abortions on viable pre-born babies in violation of KSA 65-6703, a law that bans abortions after 22 weeks gestation with two narrow exceptions. The abortion must be necessary to preserve the life of the pregnant woman, or a condition must exist where “a continuation of the pregnancy will cause a substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman.”

Judge Eric Yost found that there was probable cause to believe that crimes had been committed after he reviewed the evidence presented by Kline on December 21. The next day, pro-abortion District Attorney Nola Foulston requested a hearing before Judge Paul W. Clark, from which Kline and his office were excluded. She persuaded Clark, a fellow Democrat, to dismiss the case against Tiller on jurisdictional grounds. At a later hearing held on December 27, Clark completely ignored Kansas law that specifically states that an Attorney General is allowed to file charges in District Court, and refused to reverse his earlier ruling.

Records indicate that Foulston accepted campaign contributions from the Tiller family during her first bid for District Attorney. This and other links to Tiller makes Foulston’s angry emotional demands to drop the abortionist’s charges suspect.

“These people are going to a lot of trouble to make sure the evidence against Tiller never sees the light of day,” said Newman. “The average man on the street sees this behavior and can sense that there is some serious monkey-business going on here to circumvent the normal judicial process.”

Credible Witnesses Ignored by Media

But what of the evidence that convinced Judge Yost to allow the charges to be filed, and that persuaded another judge in Shawnee County to rule that there is probable cause to believe that Tiller has committed crimes?

Filed with the complaint was a witness list and special documents to support the complaint. While those documents are sealed, a closer look at the witnesses is revealing and gives us great insight into the evidence the Attorney General’s office has against Tiller.

Include in the list is Dr. Paul McHugh, who is the Director of the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and Psychiatrist-in-chief of the Johns Hopkins Hospital. He is also a member of the President’s Council on Bioethics. Dr. McHugh filed an affidavit in support of the Tiller charges.

Dr. McHugh’s expertise goes to the heart of the complaint, which includes the allegations that Tiller committed late abortions based on the faulty diagnoses of major anxiety disorder, acute stress, and single episodes of major depressive disorder.

Mental Health and Abortion Law

While the “mental health” exception is not encoded in law, the Kansas Supreme Court has ruled that a woman’s mental health should be considered as an exception to the post-viability abortion ban under strict conditions. Former Kansas Attorney General Carla Stovall, a staunch abortion supporter, issued an opinion still in effect today that serves to clarify when the mental health exception may be applied as a legitimate exception to the ban on post-viability abortions.

Stoval’s opinion concludes, “In our opinion, the term ‘bodily function,’ such as used in K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 65-6703, would be interpreted by the courts to include an exception for risks to maternal mental health, as well as physical health, as long as such risk is substantial and irreversible.” (emphasis added)

Kansas law also requires that two unaffiliated doctors independently verify that late-term abortions meet the exemption requirements. At Tiller’s clinic, Dr. Ann Kristin Neuhaus was that second physician. Neither Neuhaus nor Tiller are psychiatrists, neither do they have any psychiatric background. They are not trained or qualified to make the diagnoses of mental disorders.

If Dr. McHugh does in fact testify that the reasons listed in the medical records from Tiller’s abortion business are do not constitute “substantial and irreversible” risks to the mother, then Tiller may face an insurmountable hurdle in trying to legally justify those abortions.

“Smoking Gun”

But the “smoking gun” in this case may very well be the testimony of Dr. Ann Kristin Neuhaus, a former abortionist, and until last week, as associate of Tiller’s who would go to Tiller’s abortion clinic in Wichita once a week and provide the second signature required by law certifying that each abortion met the narrow exceptions to the Kansas ban on post-viability abortions.

“Neuhaus has decided, for whatever reasons, to roll over on Tiller. She will be a very credible witness because she is a physician, she has experience with abortions, and she has worked inside Tiller’s clinic, supposedly personally interviewing every one of Tiller’s abortion patients who are 22 weeks or more pregnant,” said Newman. “Neuhaus has first hand knowledge about what goes on inside that clinic. Her testimony could be the evidence needed to finally bring Tiller to justice.”

Need for Public Outcry

But only if the case is allowed to move forward. It may take public pressure for those who are obstructing the progress of this case to stop interferring and allow Tiller to answer the allegations against him. However, the public can only speak out about what they know. By not covering the relevant facts of this story, and focusing instead on petty personality issues, the media is making sure that public outcry never happens.

On the other hand, Operation Rescue is working to report the news and expose the true issues behind this case of national interest and importance. OR is planning an event for January 19-22 called aptly “A Cry For Justice” to give the public an opportunity to raise their voices about the injustice of public officials blocking a criminal case of someone who has done political favors for them — at the cost of innocent lives that should have had the protection of law.

“The only way the public will ever have any confidence that political corruption has not thwarted justice is for the case to go forward. Let the evidence come out and let the witnesses speak,” said Newman. “We must hold these officials accountable to allow the justice system to work, and that can only be done through an informed and involved public.”
_____________________

Please continue to contact District Attorney Nola Foulston and respectfully ask her to remove herself from any participation in the Tiller criminal investigation and prosecution.

District Attorney Nola Foulston
Voice: 316-660-3600
Toll Free: 800-432-6878
E-Mail: da@sedgwick.gov

Please come to Wichita January 19-22 for the “Cry For Justice” national pro-life witness. Click here to visit the Cry For Justice Event Page.

Please pray for Attorney General Phill Kline as he attempts to reinstate the 30 criminal charges against Tiller. He has until January 8, 2007, when he leaves the Attorney General’s office to get the job done.

  • Share/Bookmark

INJUSTICE: Judge Ignored Kansas Law In Dismissing Tiller Case

Americans need to express outrage over Foulston’s obstruction of justice

By Cheryl Sullenger

Wichita, KS — Yesterday’s rejection of Attorney General Phill Kline’s bid to reinstate 30 criminal charges against abortionist George R. Tiller for illegal late-term abortions and reporting violations has drawn little criticism in Kansas but has created a firestorm of controversy around the nation, including from Fox News “The O’Reilly Factor” program. At the crux of the issue is Judge Paul W. Clark’s total disregard for the statutes of the State of Kansas and District Attorney Nola Foulston’s obvious misrepresentations of Kansas law.

Kasich’s Disbelief

Commentator John Kasich, sitting in for Bill O’Reilly on a program that aired on December 27, expressed disbelief that Judge Clark could rule that a State Attorney General has no authority to file criminal charges in a District Court, when in fact Kansas attorneys general have filed literally thousands of cases in every county.

“This judge is saying if in a county there is illicit, illegal activity going on and the district attorney is part of it — and I’m not saying in this case, but theoretically is part of it — the Attorney General has no power to go after the criminals?” asked Kasich. “That can’t be.”

Kansas Statutes Ignored

Meanwhile, Kline expressed frustration that the Kansas media did not report on the fact that Clark ignored Kansas statutes that clearly give the Attorney General authority to file criminal cases without the consent of the District Attorney.

“Investigations in Kansas often times are conducted by ‘inquisition,’” Kline wrote in an e-mail communication with supporters on Thursday. “The process is similar to a federal ‘grand jury’ except a jury is not called and the investigation is overseen by a judge. An inquisition was opened in this case and thousands of pages of documents, expert witnesses, witness testimony and affidavits have been obtained. The charges filed were supported by the evidence obtained in the inquisition. This evidence prompted Sedgwick County District Court Judge Eric Yost to find probable cause to believe that Mr. Tiller committed the crimes alleged. Of course, Tiller is presumed innocent by law of any charges unless convicted in court.”

The statute Kline referred to is K.S.A. 22-3103: “(i)f the testimony taken at an inquisition discloses probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed…the attorney general…may file such testimony, together with his complaint…against the person or persons alleged to have committed the crime…and a warrant shall there upon be issued for the arrest of such person…as in other criminal cases.” (emphasis added).

“This law reads very clear,” said Kline.

Judicial Cowardice?

Operation Rescue President Troy Newman, who was present during Wednesday’s hearing made the following observations: “It was obvious to me that Judge Clark just wanted this case out of his courtroom with as little backlash as possible. For him to rule as he did accomplished two things for him. It kept him from having to admit he ruled improperly by dismissing Tiller’s charges just before Christmas, and it kept him from having to deal with Foulston’s temper tantrums,” Newman said in reference to an incident during the proceeding where Foulston raised her voice in a tirade against Kline. “His ruling was more of an act of self-preservation than justice. The public should be howling about this!”

Newman was quoted in the Wichita Eagle saying, “A district attorney should be more interested in pursuing truth and justice, rather than getting into a power play with the attorney general. This is Queen Nola trying to run Sedgwick County like it’s her own little kingdom.”

When Is A “Misrepresentation” A Lie?

Kline also pointed out that Foulston misrepresented Kansas law on three points during Wednesday’s hearing.

“District Attorney Nola Foulston argued that she could pre-empt action by the Attorney General, that the statute of limitations had run on all of the cases and that there was no ability to appeal Judge Clark’s dismissal actions,” said Kline, indicating that Kansas law supported none of those assertions.

Newman was skeptical of Foulston’s apparent unfamiliarity with Kansas statutes. “We do not know if she is just ignorant of the law, if she purposefully misrepresented it to the court. In either case, Foulston now has a huge integrity problem.”

Special Prosecutor

Meanwhile, Kline appointed Wichita attorney Donald McKinney as special independent prosecutor in the Tiller case. Foulston told reporters that she would block any special prosecutor from working in her district. “I am the special prosecutor,” she said.

Attorney General-elect Paul Morrison, who takes Kline’s place as Kansas’ “top cop” in January today told reporters that he is not inclined to have a special prosecutor handle the Tiller case, and even if he did, “It certainly won’t be Mr. McKinney.”

Incoming AG Has Ties To Tiller

Morrison benefited during the recent election from an estimated one million dollars in “hit piece” campaign ads mailed throughout Kansas attacking Kline from third-party groups with direct ties to Tiller. Morrison had pledged to drop all investigations into Tiller and a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic in Overland Park, if elected. However, Morrison has since qualified his statements.

“Morrison is only saying he will look at the charges because he knows if he doesn’t, everyone will know he is paying back Tiller for his support during the election, but mark my words, Morrison will never prosecute Tiller in spite of everything he is saying right now. He owes Tiller too much,” said Newman. “In any other state in the Union, that would be called ‘corruption.’”

Outrage Over Injustice

Can Attorney General Kline get a hearing on law and not on emotionalism and cronyism? Newman says that will be up to the people of America.

“Now is the time to express our outrage at this shocking injustice. We know that Tiller is being charged with illegally killing viable late-term babies who should have had the protection of law. We know that the doctor who came to his abortion clinic and signed off on those abortions, Kristin Neuhaus, has turned state’s evidence and is now willing to testify against Tiller. These are serious charges — an astounding 30 of them — charges that need to be heard in a court of law. If we cannot speak up over this, then we should be ashamed. We cannot let this matter be thwarted and forgotten.”

“The O’Reilly Factor” guest host John Kasich agrees. “The story is not going to go away. O’Reilly won’t let it go away. Hopefully the people in that state won’t let it go away.”
_____________________

LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD! (Whether you live in Kansas or not)

Please call District Attorney Nola Foulston and ask her to stop obstructing justice and allow the charges against Tiller to go forward.

District Attorney Nola Foulston
Voice: 316-660-3600
Toll Free: 800-432-6878
E-Mail: da@sedgwick.gov

Come to Operation Rescue’s event “A Cry for Justice” January 19-22, 2007. We will focus the eyes of the nation on this injustice and continue to apply public pressure on the authorities that are able to bring Tiller to justice once and for all. For more information about this national, critically-timed event, please visit our Cry for Justice Event Page.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tiller’s Case Remains Dismissed — AG Reserves Right to Appeal

Clark rules Foulston did not “acquiesce.”

CLICK HERE TO VIEW O’REILLY FACTOR SEGMENT DISCUSSING THIS RULING (12/27/06, courtesy of kansasmeadowlark.com)

Read text of Kline’s Statement regarding this ruling

Wichita, KS — Charges remain dismissed against late-term abortionist George R. Tiller after Judge Paul W. Clark refused to overturn his ruling that Kline had no authority to file the charges in Sedgwick County without the invitation or “acquiescence” of District Attorney Nola Foulston, in spite of clear statutory law to the contrary.

Assistant Attorney General Steven Maxwell presented arguments that Kline did in fact have the authority to file because the matter fell under the jurisdictional guidelines of a criminal inquiry. Those rules allow an attorney general to file in any county in Kansas, according to Maxwell.

District Attorney Nola Foulston became animated during her arguments as she asserted that she and she alone held the authority to prosecute criminal cases in the 18th District Court. “The District Attorney is being usurped by some out-of towner on his way out as Attorney General,” Foulston said in a loud, angry voice. “I control the prosecution of cases I this jurisdiction!”

A reporter in the audience who was representing a Christian-based radio station audibly responded, “Yes, that’s the problem.” She immediately complied with Judge Clark’s request that she remove herself from the courtroom.

“At that point I was starting to wonder about Foulston’s ability to control her emotions,” said Operation Rescue staff member Cheryl Sullenger, who was present at the hearing. “It was clear that she took this all very personally, and as an attack on her power and authority, terms she repeatedly used during what I would describe as a tirade. It was very clear that Nola rules the roost in Sedgwick County and even the judges are afraid to oppose her.”

Foulston created a moment of drama in the court when she mistakenly asserted that the statute of limitations had expired on each of the 30 counts filed last week by Kline. However, Maxwell pointed out that he was surprised to hear that Foulston was unfamiliar with the fact that the legislature had extended the statute of limitations from three to five years on charges of this nature.

Maxwell told the court that Kline plans to appoint Wichita attorney Don McKinney as special independent prosecutor of the Tiller case. He also expressed that the Attorney General’s office would reserve the right to appeal.

Attorney General Phill Kline did not attend the hearing, but appeared in the courthouse afterwards to answer questions of the media. He stated that Foulston cited no relevant case law to support her position.

In the end, Clark said the motion rested on whether or not Foulston “acquiesced.” Maxwell insisted that she did, and only objected after the case was filed. Foulston insisted she did not. Clark arbitrarily ruled, based on nothing in particular, that Foulston did not “acquiesce,” leaving the case dismissed.

“This just goes to show the political muscle Tiller flexes in this state,” said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman, who was also present at the hearing. “But this case is far from over. We strongly believe that once an appeals court hears the arguments, the charges will be reinstated. We won’t rest until Tiller is brought to justice for these crimes.”

  • Share/Bookmark